The hypocritical LibLabCon have banned clapping on the three 90-minute debates due to be televised ‘in case the studio audience influences TV viewers’. The audience will be hand-picked for political ‘fairness’ and will be allowed to ask questions once they’ve been cleared for ‘balance’.
The liberal elite make me sick.
They didn’t mind audience participation (booing, jeering) when Nick Griffin appeared on Question Time, in fact they encouraged it.
‘As compensation for being excluded from the main television debates' the BNP will be appearing on BBC news programmes in the run up to the election.
Let's hope that this time Nick gets a fair crack at the whip.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has refused to answer written questions submitted to it over six months ago on why it has not acted against a black police officers’ association that specifically forbids whites from being members.
The written complaint, submitted by British National Party Dagenham councillor Lawrence Rustem, was initiated after the Race Gestapo’s legal action was launched against the BNP over its membership criteria.
In August 2009, Cllr Rustem wrote to the EHRC asking if that body will “be taking action against the racially discriminatory policy of the Gloucester Black Police Association’s full membership policy which is designed to ‘benefit black staff employed by the Gloucestershire Constabulary?’
“Moreover, it is arguably the case that the GBPA is also acting in a discriminatory and therefore illegal manner, in that it seeks to maintain the ‘welfare of black staff’ and to ensure ‘service delivery to the black communities of Gloucestershire.’
“There is obviously no mention of the GBPA’s desire to ensure the ‘welfare of white staff’ or indeed to ensure ’service delivery to the white communities of Gloucestershire.’
“All of this can be evidenced from the GBPA’s membership criteria,” Cllr Rustem wrote. “One can only deduce that the GBPA is operating in a manner which is not conducive to ‘equality’ or indeed the ‘human rights’ of the indigenous community of Gloucestershire that such a service is and should be provided to all.
“As this is obviously a case of open discrimination by the GBPA, can the EHRC please advise me on what steps the Commission will be taking to address this issue?
“Furthermore, I would like confirmation of when action will be taken.
“Finally, can you please advise me of what action will be taken against other such organisations which cater specifically on ethnic grounds for people from ethnic minorities and when these proceedings will commence?” he wrote.
Cllr Rustem received a response — which was unsigned and anonymous — back from the EHRC’s Legal Enforcement Directorate on 1 October.
This letter said that “the Equality and Human Rights Commission Enforcement Directorate” will “carry out a preliminary assessment of the issues you have raised to enable the Commission to assess whether, and if so what, enforcement action is appropriate in this case.”
That was the last Cllr Rustem heard from the EHRC. “As one can see, the Equality and Human Rights Commission are very slow at responding when the role of equality is reversed and others seek ‘equality and human rights’ from them,” Cllr Rustem told BNP News.
“That must leave one with the obvious conclusion that in the eyes of the EHRC, some are more equal than others — rather much like the society that was endured in the abomination of humanity that was the former Soviet Union.”
If you were the chief of a research body that said the Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035 and truly believed in climate change, would you really have a chauffeur drive you to a meeting only one mile away?
Dr Rajendra Pachauri, who earned the Nobel Peace Prize for his work, has done just that.
The news is full of hypocrites today and here is the first...
The hypocritical Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), has once again shown he doesn’t practice what he preaches.
According to new findings, the wages of white staff are 9.66% higher than ethnics, able bodied staff receive 8.9% more than disabled staff and men receive 3.04% more than women.
This video is for all those who hate the BNP but greet the terrorist Nelson Mandela with open arms. In this video Nelson Mandela sings with his communist comrades about killing white people.
For decades the ANC propagated this extreme hatred towards the white minority of South Africa. Has this contributed to the extreme violence being perpetrated against the white minority of South Africa today?
FAQ:
Q:What does "bhulu" really mean?
A: Answer from answers.yahoo.com by: Porgie (abridged)
It does in fact mean "white people".
Black South Africans used to and some still call "white South Africans" boer. It's a word derived from the Afrikaans word for farmer.
"Ama" is the Xhosa prefix that means "a lot of"
"bhulu" is the Xhosa word for "boer"
The Xhosa people have a difficult time pronouncing "R", because the Xhosa pronounce this letter as the "ch" in Reich. They therefore substituted the "r" at the end of "boer" with the letter ''L".
Lastly the "oe" sound is in fact "oo" as in moo or goo. The Xhosa people substituted this sound with the letter "u".
So a direct translation should really be "boers", the plural for "boer"
Definition of "boer": (NOUN: A Dutch colonist or descendant of a Dutch colonist in South Africa. ETYMOLOGY: Afrikaans, from Dutch, farmer, from Middle Dutch gheboer, peasant; see bheu- in Indo-European roots)
And that's the story of "amabhulu". Some may find it offensive and some may translate it as negative.
Source(s):
I'm a language practitioner with majors in Afrikaans/Dutch and Xhosa. (by Porgie)
