I've heard it all now.
Children's Research Lab at the University of Texas has determined the babies as young as 6 months old are racist!
This is the stupidity of the teachers in todays world.
Wednesday, 30 September 2009
Tuesday, 29 September 2009
Some people need to wake up and stop listening to the unbelievable lies spouted by the UAF and some Islamic MP's. How can anyone call this group far right, facist Nazi's is beyond belief. Since when were Nazi groups multi-race?!?
Next Demo is 10th October in Manchester. Be there in support and hopefully this can put an end to the lies and constant 'right wing' tag. Its not racist to oppose Islamic Extremism!
Labour MPs are said to be plotting to boycott his flagship TV programme in protest at the questions about the PM's health, it emerged today.
Marr was yesterday involved in a row with housing minister Ian Austin, who confronted the BBC presenter in the main conference hotel about his Brown interview.
Some ministers are also said to be reconsidering whether to accept invitations to go on the Andrew Marr Show, which airs on Sunday mornings.
The BBC interviewer has faced strong criticism at the Labour Party conference after he asked Gordon Brown at the weekend if he took 'prescription painkillers or pills' to help him carry out his job.
Schools Secretary Ed Balls last night questioned Marr's 'integrity', telling a fringe meeting that broadcasters should not propagate false allegations put around by 'malicious bloggers'.
He added: 'It's really important that those people in positions of responsibility, not tweeting to people but broadcasting to millions, understand the nature of their power and responsibility.'
Jon Cruddas, a senior backbencher and touted as a possible leadership candidate, said Marr's conduct had been 'absolutely disgraceful' and refused to appear on his BBC show.
Marr has defended his approach, but admitted that he 'got it in the neck' at a Coalfields Communities Federation reception yesterday.
Lord Kinnock and Lord Mandelson claimed he had simply repeated rumours spread by the 'extreme Right-wing blogosphere'.
From their response we can take it that it's true then.
Sunday, 27 September 2009
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
Enough fascism from the UAF.
Write or call your MP or representative if on this list, and please post the result of whether they REALLY support the violence and fascism that the UAF stand for and claim.
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
Two million pounds a day. That is how much asylum seekers are costing this country, yet the French Government and do-gooders of our
French riot police have closed down the camp - The Jungle - that mainly
Why? We have been saying for years that if someone wants to claim asylum they should stay in the first safe country they reach. We have been called racist for daring to speak openly and yet now the UK Border Agency is saying the same.
Why should we take in more and more immigrants. We need to look after our own instead of pandering to others. Close the borders, ship out the illegals and terrorists.
Monday, 21 September 2009
A TEACHING union is threatening to take Stoke-on-Trent City Council to court unless it bans BNP councillors from serving as school governors.
The NASUWT says the move would help protect children and school staff from the far-right party's "pernicious agenda for hatred and discrimination".
Now it has written to all local education authorities, including Stoke-on-Trent, to urge them to review whether they are complying with the Race Relations Act.
The union says it is "fully prepared to file for judicial review" if councils do not offer "appropriate advice or take appropriate action" to stop BNP members being appointed as governors.
There are already six BNP councillors in the Potteries who sit on governing bodies and they could be forced to step down if any legal action is successful. All of them were appointed by the council.
Today, Chris Keates, general secretary of the NASUWT, told The Sentinel: "We will be looking very carefully at the governing bodies in Stoke-on-Trent."
She said the campaign to prevent party members becoming governors was triggered by an East Midlands case, where a BNP councillor could become vice-chairman of governors at a primary school.
But she added: "Stoke-on-Trent is a deep concern to the NASUWT, because of the number of BNP councillors."
The union represents thousands of classroom teachers across the city, although it's not clear how many members work in schools which have BNP governors.
The BNP today branded the NASUWT's stance as discrimination and vowed to fight any attempt to introduce a ban.
Alby Walker, BNP group leader on the city council, said: "The teaching union would be best keeping out of politics. They are trying to politicise the role of school governors.
"My councillors all do a good job as school governors. They do it because they want the best for the children."
In a statement, the city council said: "All city councillors are democratically elected and their nomination and election to panels and committees follow due council process.
"All city councillors are required to sign up to the members' code of conduct, under which they undertake to do nothing in their official capacity which will cause the council to breach the equality laws."
THE END OF DEMOCRACY
This is a group who have peddled left wing anti-establishment propaganda for years, long before the BNP was formed. If they are able to use legal means from stopping democratically elected people from office the end of democracy is in sight.
A recent report in the press said that three quarters of the teaching profession believed teaching patriotism was brainwashing our children.
I have no doubt that some smart Alec will come up with Samuel Johnson's quote that "patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel". I believe that he was referring to politicians – or maybe even teachers.
If they believe that, I challenge them to meet the families of our soldiers coming home in Union Flag draped coffins and tell them they are scoundrels.
A few years later Johnson also said: "A man thinks meanly of himself for not being a soldier or been at sea," a change of heart maybe.
Our rights are being whittled away day by day by officialdom. Some members of all the other main political parties say the BNP should be banned, that meetings should be boycotted and disrupted. I have never heard a member of the BNP say that of other parties, on the contrary, they want open debate with all parties.
Are the others afraid they might lose the argument?
Fascism can come from either extreme of the political spectrum. Hitler banned any party that opposed him and had the dissenters imprisoned and in many cases executed. Stalin did the same in Russia but these men had ideas that were politically opposite.
Today's politics is based on lies and deceit but they don't call it that they call it spin. I remember Screaming Lord Sutch and his Monster Raving Looney Party, of course with his barmy ideas he never stood a chance of getting elected, and this is where the spin doctors triumphed. They changed the name and their leader and bingo, in 1997 they were elected and have been in power ever since.
I am not a supporter of the BNP or of any other political party. I will leave you with this on which I base my argument, "I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire.
GRAHAM LENCH - THE SENTINEL
Saturday, 19 September 2009
It has just been reported on Arteinfo channel that there have been several riots in some 'quartiers populaire',(news speak for immigrant enriched areas) of Brussels, between riot police and immigrants since the end of Ramadam.
This does suggest, therefore that they are muslims. No reasons have been given at present as to why these riots began.
Police in the Belgian capital Brussels have arrested 43 people following a second night of civil unrest.
On Thursday, nine police were injured, one seriously, when violence broke out after a 14-year-old was taken into custody in the suburb of Molenbeek.
The area has a large population of North African immigrants and the youth was wanted by the authorities for taunting officers on the beat during Ramadan.
Police came under attack from stones and Molotov cocktails and cars in the area were torched.
The authorities responded with water canon and 100 officers brought the situation under control but tension remains high.
Article by the Green Arrow
Friday, 18 September 2009
You can be proud to be anything but white.
A HATE fanatic has boasted that Muslims will one day conquer Britain - by having more BABIES.
Speaking at a rally marking 9/11, Anjem Choudary bragged that a birth explosion would let followers of Islam take control of the country.
Undercover Sun investigators secretly recorded Choudary telling a young and impressionable audience that they would eventually rule under strict Sharia law.
And our team listened in chilled silence as he predicted: "Islam is superior and will never be surpassed. The flag of Islam will rise over Downing Street."
Lawyer Choudary also said it would be easy for vast numbers of Muslims to declare Jihad, or holy war, against Britain - and that every one of them could become "a time bomb waiting to go off".
The Sun team watched vile Choudary, the right-hand man of exiled preacher of hate Omar Bakri, ranting to 100 young Muslims at a meeting in East London.
The mob bayed and cheered as he said: "About 500 people in Britain become Muslim every day.
"The Home Office say there are 1.5million Muslims but there were 1.5million ten years ago. Since then our brothers in Bethnal Green, Whitechapel and other places have had eight or nine children each. Eight children here, ten children, 15 children. There must be at least six million people.
"It may be by pure conversion that Britain will become an Islamic state. We may never need to conquer it from the outside."
The rally - advertised as a debate on whether the West had "learned the lessons" of 9/11 - was held amid strict security in a hall above a mosque in Lea Bridge Road, Leyton. Stewards on the door demanded ID from non-Muslims.
Inside the atmosphere was tense as dozens of young men in their teens or 20s packed chairs at the front while the few women present were ushered to the back. Choudary - whose family live on £25,000 a year in benefits - whipped them into a frenzy with a speech calling for Sharia law, under which criminals and adulterers are stoned or have limbs amputated.
He roared: "We do not integrate into Christianity. We will ensure that one day you will integrate into the Sharia Islamic law. Our eyes are on Downing Street."
He went on: "That is why the British are so afraid. It would be easy for us to declare Jihad in Britain and each one of us could become a time-bomb waiting to go off. But we are not people who betray."
Choudary, who once called for the Pope to be executed and said the 9/11 hijackers were "magnificent martyrs", also claimed without a shred of evidence that 200 Muslim women were locked up in British jails.
Midway through the three-hour rally there was a break for prayers and food. The audience knelt on the floor and free chicken curry and bottles of water were handed out - but nobody ate or drank until a signal from chairman Abu Omar.
Another hate-filled speaker, Saiful Islam, praised terror chief Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda for their courage in retaliating against the West's "oppression".
He warned of a repeat of the 9/11 attacks in which more than 3,000 died in America, or another 7/7 suicide attack in London. He said: "The blame of 9/11 belongs to no one but the American government. They are the terrorists.
"Sheikh Osama warned America numerous times, it was because of their own arrogance, because they thought they are a superpower and nobody could match them, that Sheikh Osama taught them a lesson - a lesson they still haven't learned."
Referring to Iraq and Afghanistan, he warned the US and Britain: "Wake up. Withdraw. Listen. All of us have a part to play in stopping the violence or the next 9/11 will take place in Britain, the next 7/7 could take place locally."
The meeting was also addressed by law lecturer Abu Saalihah and there was a live webcam link to Omar Bakri at his Lebanon hideout.
Yesterday unrepentant Bakri said he could not understand what moderate Muslims have against Bin Laden.
He also dismissed 9/11 as "just an event" which was neither good nor bad but comparable to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Speaking from Beirut he said: "Osama Bin Laden is a legendary person for Muslims round the world."
Thursday, 17 September 2009
Police are investigating an undercover film that shows a supermarket worker licking fresh chickens before putting them back on sale at an Asda store.
The mobile phone footage also shows the man wreaking havoc in the aisles during his night shifts, urinating in a bin in the gentlemens lavatory, playing cricket with food items, smashing eggs and setting off fire extinguishers.
The man who called himself Adeel Ayub is dressed in Asdas distinctive green uniform, as he laughs and gloats about his behaviour at the firms Fulwood store in Preston, Lancashire. This store was picked by Asda bosses to feature in a new TV advertising campaign which was filmed in May.
The worker is also observed wrecking furniture in a staff room, slashing the coats of colleagues and filming firefighters responding to a false alarm.
His spree, thought to have been filmed by a colleague over several night shifts, led to the closure of the staffroom and a £50 reward from the company for information about the damage.
Mr Ayub, who worked for the company from 2005 to last year, is also spotted returning to the store this year wearing a hoodie and stamping his feet on fresh ready-to-cook chickens in the chiller unit.
He also rips open the plastic wrapping around one of the chickens, pokes his fingers in the flesh and licks the breast before returning the bird to the shelf.
His antics were uncovered after the film was left anonymously in a brown envelope at a local newspaper. Asda was handed a copy and immediately called in police.
Management at the store had known there was a problem with vandalism but had not been able to identify the culprit.
Asda said yesterday: We are absolutely disgusted and appalled by the behaviour of this man. We knew there was a problem and we now have evidence of criminal damage which our security staff and lawyers are discussing with police.
Mr Ayub even gives a running commentary of his actions on the film which he refers to as a top-secret video that is never going to get released.
He is also seen breaking trophies awarded to the store, hurling boxes of eggs in a warehouse and playing football with boxes of food.
After releasing a fire extinguisher, the fire brigade arrived on the scene and he is heard to boast: I think this baby is my last video because if I get caught Ill probably get sacked.
Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service, confirmed that it had received two false alarm calls to the store last year. It condemned the footage.
A spokesman said: We deplore this behaviour. Hoax calls take up firefighters time and setting off an alarm system takes crews away from genuine emergencies. Its a criminal activity.
Asda admitted there were no CCTV cameras in the area of the store where the film was taken but the spokeswoman said the issue of internal security cameras in all stores was under review.
The supermarket chain, owned by Walmart, confirmed that the man had been employed on a permanent contract from August 2005 to April 2007 and had then become a seasonal worker until September 2008. It appealed for anyone with any further information about the incidents to contact Asda headquarters in Leeds.
Four years ago the Bernard Matthews turkey firm was embarrassed by undercover footage which showed the cruelty of two workers who used live birds as baseballs at a factory in Haveringland, Norfolk.
Animal welfare campaigners secretly filmed them hitting birds with a pole. Both admitted ill-treatment and were each sentenced to carry out 200 hours of community service.
Video courtesy of 6MadeInEngland9
10 October, Manchester. This is a peaceful demo .
Muslim and leftist provoke trouble. As soon as they get a reaction the police trap all edl members in pubs trains train stations and round them up to stop them joining the affray, therefore our demo never gets its numbers and is soon cancelled can all coming come early and get together and behave to show the country we mean business.
Video by DAISYMANONE
The islamic religion maybe an evil religion but just as dangerous to this country is the dirty unkept members of the disgusting and racist UAF.
These idiots would riot and demonstrate for any reason at all they are full time trouble makers! These anti British english hating scum are a disgrace to this country ,there mantra "smash the racist BNP" is just as relevant to them "smash the racist UAF".
These idiots dont care about the muslims they are just using it as an excuse to further their aims to make this country a communist regime Muslim;s ask yourselves where you would be in that sort of regime?
Video by iamlegion4wearemany
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
The sights you see when you haven't got your gun.
Monday, 14 September 2009
Saturday, 12 September 2009
Todays first is about our school teachers. They have been brainwashed by our government to be non-patriotic and to hate anything British. As the government realise the British people have had enough of being treated as second class citizens they are trying to reverse their teachings in the hope of holding on to office. They haven't a hope in hell.
Take a look at the following article and see just how good their brainwashing of our teachers has been...
Three-quarters of teachers in
's schools believe they should warn pupils about the dangers of patriotism - which some regard as a form of 'brainwashing', researchers have found. Britain
A nationwide study found the majority of teachers felt they should not be promoting the subject at all in the classroom, with some preferring to instruct their pupils in the benefits of 'universal brotherhood'.
And even those who felt positively about patriotism felt the need to qualify and tone down their support, stressing that they disliked 'jingoistic flag-waving'.
The findings are a blow for the Government after Prime Minister Gordon Brown spoke out in favour of encouraging pupils to be patriotic, calling for 'Britishness' lessons to be part of the curriculum.
The study by the
at the Instituteof Education surveyed teachers and pupils at 20 secondary schools, and found 74 per cent believed it was their duty to point out the danger of patriotic sentiments Universityof London
'Praising patriotism excludes non-British pupils,' one teacher told researchers.
'Patriotism about being British divides groups along racial lines, when we aim to bring pupils to an understanding of what makes us the same.'
Other responses included:
- 'We shouldn't be promoting patriotism. We should be promoting universal brotherhood.'
- 'I think we should identify as humans.'
- 'I don't think you should be grooming children to be patriotic. That's as bad as telling everyone that they've got to be a certain religion - I am not going to brainwash anyone.'
While two-thirds of teachers claimed they encouraged discussion of patriotism in their classrooms, more than half of pupils said patriotism was never discussed at school.
In their report, Dr Joanne Pearce and Dr Michael Hand argue much of history and politics is incomprehensible without understanding of the power of patriotic sentiment.
They told the Times Educational Supplement: 'Schools have a responsibility to ensure that students not only understand the phenomenon of patriotism, but are equipped to make reasoned judgments about the place it should occupy in their own emotional lives.'
Novelist and commentator Frederick Forsyth said: 'I wish these teachers would see that patriotism in the sense of that quiet pride is nothing to be afraid of. It's not aggressive. It doesn't put down foreigners. It doesn't noisily wave flags and it certainly doesn't swerve towards the
There's nothing wrong with the BNP. It's about time time more people realised what we British are up against and did something about it.
Get over to the British National Party website and join true patriots in the struggle against our failing nation. or should that have read 'falling'?
Friday, 11 September 2009
Wakey, wakey, people. This is straight from the horses mouth.
Story by Ed Husain, Daily Mail.
Like many young British Muslims, I was 'radicalised' at college. Just as the three British-born men who were found guilty this week of plotting to blow flights out of the sky were recruited at school, I encountered extreme Muslims at the age of 16 and was slowly converted to their ranks.
At my East London college, the Islamic society was run by the extremist group Hizb ut Tahrir, which believes in setting up an Islamic state, destroying Israel, and denounces Western values.
At first, I, too, was convinced by their rhetoric. However one awful violent moment changed me for ever. A young African man was knifed to death by the Muslim contingent at the college, simply for being a non-believer.
After a petty row over the use of the snooker table, the Muslim group issued a call of Jihad against the young man and summoned their Hizb ut Tahrir contacts for 'outside backup'.
An operative arrived and plunged a dagger into the boy's heart. The victim's name was Ayotunde Obunabi and I saw him lying dead. To Hizb ut Tahrir his life was worthless because he was not a Muslim.
At that moment I understood the consequences of the rhetoric of radicalism.
The murder, in 1996, compelled me to walk away from extremism. Now I believe I have to speak out about what I see happening in Britain before a terrible act of terrorism claims yet more lives.
Although one fanatical Muslim cell has been caught, this is no time for complacency. Make no mistake, terrorism is flourishing in our country as never before.
Why? Because a toxic combination of politically correct policy, denial and fear have opened the way for hate to grow in our midst.
Unwilling or unable to recognise the scale and cause of the danger we are all facing, our leaders have turned a blind eye to what is going on.
There are now tens of thousands of Muslims living in Britain, physically present in our country, but psychologically attached to Muslim-dominated countries.
Large parts of our cities have become Muslim ghettos, where you can wake up in the morning and go to bed at night without seeing a non-Muslim face.
They might as well be in Pakistan or Afghanistan for all the contact they have with ordinary Britain. They can send their children to Muslim state schools, go to Muslim NHS doctors, and do business at the Islamic bank.
Not only this, but we, the taxpayers, fund many of these Muslim ghettos. When immigrants arrive in this country to claim free housing from the Government, they are given a choice of Muslim areas to settle in. Why do we allow this? Why not offer these new arrivals housing where they can integrate with the British people and learn about our nation's culture?
Meanwhile, our prisons have become recruiting centres for radical imams, or Islamic priests.
Around 10,000 ordinary Muslims are in our prison system, sharing space with convicted terrorists and extremists, putting them at risk of brainwashing.
But instead of protecting them from this, our system actually directs them towards these forces. So when a young Asian drug dealer from Bradford's streets goes down, he is designated a practising Muslim, whether he was previously religious or not.
He is issued with a prayer mat and a copy of the Koran and is handed over to the prison imams, many of whom come from the same Islamic school of thought that produced the Taliban. Time and time again, I have seen Muslims go into prison as young Asian men, and return to their communities as something very different.
Then there are the satellite television stations that freely transmit the radical Islamic message straight into British homes. Thousands of UK Muslims-watch the Islam channel for their news instead of the BBC or ITN.
The tragedy is that it doesn't have to be like this. There are four million Muslims living in America, and yet they are not producing 'home-grown' bombers like ours, despite America leading the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that are so often cited by extremists as the root cause of their grievance.
Because of their stronger national identity, the Americans encourage immigrants to join their culture and newcomers are expected to be loyal to the U.S.
For us, it is not too late. We can reverse the damaging policies that have made Britain a seedbed for terrorists. But if we fail to do so, I fear we will see further carnage unleashed on our streets.
Sunday, 6 September 2009
It nearly kicked off again yesterday when the EDL held a demo in Birmingham.
Police did NOTHING when a gang of asians tried to attack a peaceful protest. Instead the EDL were hussled onto buses and shipped out.
Not before chasing off the asians...
WORSENING OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER
SEVERE DEPRESSION CONTROLLED BY DANGEROUS DRUGS
FAILING SIGHT IN 'GOOD' EYE
A Political Wing special
"The Prime Minister of Great Britain is a man too ill to be holding the Office." This was the conclusion last week of a senior civil servant liaising regularly with Gordon Brown. For reasons which will become clear, the person involved will not go public with the evidence for this conclusion. The same applies to a high-ranking Treasury official who told us "In both a physical and mental sense, the Prime Minister is a very sick man, seriously disabled." Three years ago, an Opposition MP told nby "He is on extremely heavy doses of cutting-edge anti-depressants, but so far they have made little difference". And during the last fortnight, another high-ranking government source claimed "He is now on pills which restrict the foods he can eat and what he can drink. He is losing the sight of his good eye quite rapidly. It's a mess, and nobody knows what to do".
Rumours have circulated about Gordon Brown's health for a number of years. As long ago as 2004, Simon Heffer wrote in the Spectator that he displayed many signs of Asperger's syndrome: humourlessness, lack of irony and obsessional behaviour patterns. Nby itself ran a long piece in February 2007, predicting fairly accurately how Brown's rigid responses to given situations would prove to be inappropriate, and his behaviour in the end dysfunctional. We noted at the time 'If the Labour Party can organise seventy-three signatories to a document of intent named 'Anyone but Gordon', then there must be something about the man which might make him unfit to be Prime Minister'. In fact, we had already been advised by then that the PM had been on large doses of SSRI anti-depressants - the class of drugs derived from Prozac.
The overall story is well known in lobbyist circles. A senior member of this group told us that "Brown is in a very dark place. Sarah [hiswife, Mrs Brown] has begged him on several occasions to seek help, but he resists most offers of advice." Yet another popular journalist said "I'm afraid all the stories about him throwing things around and screaming at secretaries are entirely true. He behaves impeccably in public and can really turn on the charm when he needs to in private - but inside the bunker he behaves appallingly. He's also binging on junk food late at night - you can see he's gaining weight"
However, our investigation suggests that there is a more important reason for the PM's weight gain: he is now on a different class of drugs, for which ballooning weight is one of the least dangerous side-effects.
These drugs are called Mono Amine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs). Before the arrival of Prozac derivatives, they were the first line of attack when dealing with severely depressed patients. But a senior physician told us last month "A GP would have to be insane to prescribe MAOIs these days - SSRIs are safer, with far fewer side-effects. Apart from anything else, it's almost impossible to get hold of them".
This is indeed correct. In 2003, SKB withdrew their MAOI brand-leader Parnate because of the dangers it represented, and also because SSRIs had none of the disadvantages. However, at the time several regional mental health units reported that for some patients, SSRIs were nowhere near as effective.
Thus there is evidence that, having tried and seen no help from the newer generation of drugs, Gordon Brown has now been put onto MAOIs. If this is true, then he is indeed in a desperate state - as we shall explain.
This evidence was handed to us inadvertantly. The senior source referred to at the start of this piece mentioned "the latest nonsense - a huge list of things he can't eat or drink because of the drugs he's on...most importantly, cheese and Chianti". Every doctor in Britain would recognise these contraindications instantly: for they are the two great verbotens for people taking MAOI drugs.
As long ago as 2001, prescribing psychiatrists described MAOIs as 'the last resort now we have better drugs'. However, for all their downsides (several thousand people around the world have died as a result of ignoring the dietary advice re MAOIs) this older class of drugs has one huge advantage: for severe depression and obsessive compulsive disorder it remains very effective.
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is relatively common. Most of us display some obsessive features in everyday life, but under stress a minority of people become borderline or actual OCD in their behaviour, and need medication to control both this and the depression which almost always presents soon afterwards. The most obvious symptom is a compulsive need to carry out functions such as hand-washing or counting almost incessantly. (The Asperger's syndrome 'Rain Man' personality displays these too, but the two conditions are easily separable on other bases. Our view is that Brown has OCD, not Asperger's syndrome.)
Gordon Brown's symptoms are obvious when viewed in this light: the constant repetition of phrases, and an almost embarrassing (for his Party) need to spray every Parliamentary answer with statistics. Lifting out of poverty, the Tories are the do-nothing Party, global problems require global solutions - these and myriad others have been repeated over and over ad nauseam. Equally, the six million lifted out of poverty, twelve million helped by mortgage benefits, two million new jobs created: when interrogated, these figures often prove to be illusory, but they - and the constant speech repetition - represent Brown's unconscious means of controlling the severe anxiety that accompanies depression with OCD.
We have no means (as yet) of proving his use of MAOIs, although the 'long list of forbidden foods' is the nearest one will get to a smoking gun - short of a written, signed diagnosis or prescription. We also cannot be certain how long the PM has been taking them, but the remark 'the latest nonsense' suggests that this is a relatively recent development. On average, a heavy dose of MAOI therapy would start to display some results within twenty days to six weeks. Gordon Brown has reportedly returned from 'easily his longest break from Downing Street' feeling 'very much refreshed and up for it'. It is more than likely he took the uncharacteristically long break on medical advice. And it will be interesting to note whether his behaviour changes.
One feature unlikely to change is the increasingly obvious difficulty he has finding his way to and from podiums, and lack of peripheral vision. This (according to a senior, medically-trained source) is the result of failing sight in the one eye he has left. We found so many confirmations of this story from so many sources, it seems to us impossible for it to be pure invention. It appears to be universally recognised in the Cabinet and upper echelons of the Civil Service.
So: here we seem to have a man (unless huges cadres of non-colluding senior people are liars) on a rarely used, dangerous drug to control his mental state - and getting close to a stage of serious disablement in relation to his eyesight. As this would clearly make any such person wholly unfit to fulfil the Premiership - especially in the dangerous, broken world we now inhabit - why hasn't the story broken more widely? Why hasn't the Opposition leapt on it? In answering this question, we need to delve into the murkier waters of Gordon Brown's psyche - and the cynical guessing-game that passes for public service in the House of Commons....on all sides.
Brown rules by fear and smear. He always has done, and it is the main thing he is known (and hated) for in the Labour Party. A former Cabinet Minister told nby in early 2008 "Nobody ran against Gordon because nobody could face the slur, innuendo and blackmail that would go with it. When he gets going, Brown and his little coterie of spinners are animals". Several similar observations appeared in national newspapers during late 2007. There has also remained the rumour that even Blair himself eventually fell foul of this, and left not of his own volition but as a result of threats from the Brown camp. That must remain as conjecture: but given his alleged track record of not entirely legal actions, Blair would have had a lot to be frightened about.
The PM evokes a certain degree of loyalty from close confidantes, but the main reason why no Brown staffer has broken ranks is that this would mean the end of the meal-ticket: either Brown would fall, or he would deny...and bury the whistle-blower. Luncheon Vouchers are also behind the remaining silence in the Parliamentary Party as a whole. Two senior Lobby correspondents have confirmed to us in the last three weeks that "even the most anti-Brown camp think there's no alternative to Brown". Nearly all Labour backbenchers now expect a rout, but think that if Brown were ousted they would be wiped out. Comically, the exact opposite view pertains in the Tory Shadow Cabinet, where "they're so terrified of Labour dumping Brown, they'd do anything to leave him precisely where he is".
This bears further examination on a number of levels. Three of our sources confirmed the general view that the parlous state of Brown's health is well-known among Conservative bigwigs. That they collude in an allegedly dangerously ill man remaining in charge of Government (purely to ensure their own victory) is selfish cynicism of the worst kind - and a damning charge to which, if and when the truth of this matter comes to light, they will have no defence. It also reinforces the electorate's feeling that senior Cameron Tories are woefully lacking in confidence - or convincing alternatives to what the Government is doing.
As to whether Brown is a liability or an asset for voters, the latest poll (30.8.09) in the Guardian showed that Brown's ratings have actually fallen as 'signs' of economic green shoots have become apparent. In short, when it comes to the Machiavellian 'keep him where he is' strategy, New Labour have called it wrong. As ever, they are probably being too clever for their own good.
Perhaps more disturbing is the passive political bias (and dereliction of Constitutional duty) represented by the obvious collusion in any cover-up about the Prime Minister's health problems throughout the senior ranks of the Civil Service. One of the main sources of this story told us, "It's a farce, and utterly disgraceful. There isn't a mandarin in Whitehall who's unaware of Brown's condition - they tittle-tattle the tale wherever they go, dining out on their inside knowledge, and yet won't lift a finger to bring it to the public's attention. We are being let down at every turn by the spineless Establishment running this country".
One can appreciate how a similar situation developed from 1935 onwards in relation to the King's relationship with Mrs Simpson. But it is hard to understand why the press - especially the right-wing press - haven't had a harder go at nailing this story in 2009. The tabloids are too busy shouting threats into celeb letter-boxes, and the more liberally inclined papers may well share the New Labour view that loyalty is their duty at this stage of the game; but that seems unlikely - and what of Dacre at The Mail, or the Telegraph, still fresh from its huge success in blowing the lid off the expenses scandal?
The answer usually comes back 'there's no physical evidence, and it's an easy story to deny - to dismiss as just another anti-Brown smear campaign'. But perhaps the clues about MAOI usage by the Prime Minister make it much harder to deny....and much easier to get written confirmation. For if it's true, Brown's entourage must be sending out strict dietary requirements ahead of his regularly catered public engagements; one could even monitor what he eats on such occasions.
Not Born Yesterday lacks both the sources and resources to do this job. The sole purpose of this piece is to get matters to a stage where the story is out in the public domain, such that the real people who count in Britain - the voters - can make their own minds up about it. And - who knows? - to create a situation in which the Opposition might at last do its duty, and question the PM's fitness for office on these well-known (if not as yet well-documented) bases.
©2009 Not Born Yesterday and John Ward.
Friday, 4 September 2009
On August 24th 2009, muslim community leader, Noor Ramjanally, contacted police alleging to have been kidnapped at knifepoint from his home by two BNP members. He said he’d been bundled into the boot of a 4 x 4 (since when has a 4 x 4 had a boot), driven to Epping Forest in Essex and ordered to stop his religious work.
The BNP had been accused of racial tension in Ramjanally’s area of Loughton in Essex, after issuing a leaflet about Ramjanally’s community group and this alleged ‘kidnap’ made national news.
"I have got the whole UK Muslim community behind me now. I am not just on my own."
However, Ramnajally has now been arrested for perverting the course of justice. In other words, he made it up.
Did Ramnajally also invent the stories of him receiving hate mail and his family home being firebombed in July?
I’ll leave you to decide.
Thursday, 3 September 2009
The British National Party has declared the “English Defence League” a proscribed organisation and it will be a disciplinary offence for any party member to be involved with that group.
Making the announcement today in a special organiser’s bulletin circulated within the party, national organiser Eddy Butler said that although the proscription had been ordered a while ago, it was being made public today because the controlled media continues to lie about the BNP and the EDL.
“Time and time again the lying media has linked the BNP with the EDL’s activities,” said Mr Butler.
“Most recently the media and the BBC Eastern regional service, in particular, lost no time in blaming the BNP when Muslim rioters attacked police in Luton.
“The BBC coverage of that event specifically said that the BNP had planned to march through Luton, and this was why the Muslims had rioted,” he said.
“This is, of course, an utter lie. The BNP does not march in the streets but rather campaigns in an ordinary democratic fashion in elections, door-to-door canvassing and leafleting,” Mr Butler continued.
“It is completely malicious and unwarranted to blame the supposed activities of organisations such as the EDL on the BNP, when there is no common ground between the two groups at all.”
The EDL has, in fact, gone out of its way to distance itself from the BNP, while the party has no interest in the sort of confrontation in which the EDL seems to seek.
In his official statement, Mr Butler said the proscription of the EDL meant that it “will be a disciplinary offence for British National Party members to associate or participate in any event or activity organised by the English Defence League or hold membership of the English Defence League.
“The reasons for this proscription are that the English Defence League, through its activities, brings nationalist and patriotic politics into disrepute. If the English Defence League is not instigated by and its activities are not encouraged by the state (which it quite possibly is), then the track record of this organisation shows that it is run by people who will only bring discredit and probable arrest for anyone who attends its events.
“The British National Party does not wish to be associated with the English Defence League in any way whatsoever.” Mr Butler’s circular ended with a request for any party official who becomes aware of any member who breaks this rule to report such incidents to email@example.com.
You will remember I wrote an article about Post Master Mr Khan in Ely, South Glamorgan, Wales, who refused to send a parcel to one of our soldiers in Afghanistan.
Mrs Davis, the soldier’s mother was also banned from Mr Khan’s post Office.
Many of you wrote to the Post Office to tell of your disgust at the way British people are being treated in their own country and above you will see a typical Post Office response.
Did you expect anything else?
When are people going to wake up to the fact that we are losing our country to invaders backed by those arrogant, self-centred dhimmi’s in charge?
Don’t take things lying down. Protest by email, telephone calls and letters. Let these people know we will not stand by and watch while they infest our lands with traitors to Queen and Country.
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
A new organization has been set up to help ex-service personnel who have been affected by homelessness.
The organisation’s website, Soldiers off the Street, is crying out for volunteers to help those courageous people who have found themselves on our streets.
An estimated 12% of homeless people are ex-service personnel.
Here are a few ways in which you can help…
Collecting clothes so we can hand them out to ex service personnel living on the streets.
If you have a spare room in your home why not consider letting it to one of these unfortunate heroes so that they can work their way into a normal life.
If you rent out properties please consider letting to these unfortunate heroes so that they can work their way into a normal life.
Once of the street they have a lot more opportunities to lead a normal life; living on the streets what chance do they have of even getting a job.
Letting a room or a property to our homeless ex service personnel does not end there, we need dedicated people that will help them back into normal society as some of them will be suffering other problems that they will need help with.
We will need volunteers that can act as a go between to try reuniting ex service personnel back into their own families. This would be the best way to go but it would be up to the homeless person we are dealing with at the time.
Volunteers to keep an eye out and speak to homeless people, and if they are ex service personnel let us know where they are.
Fundraisers of any description.
People to arrange parcels and send them on to our main office to distribute to ex service personnel on the street.
Once soldiers off the street has grown, we will need van drivers willing to go out distributing clothes, food and parcels on the streets.
If you think you can help in anyway other then what we have stated please call or e-mail us:
Soldiers Off the Street
21A Chester Street,
Tel: 01745 853 009.
Mobile: 07773 493 088.
Tuesday, 1 September 2009
The following article was in today’s Mail online.
Drink, promiscuity and a cycle of low aspiration among children mean
is becoming the 'bad parent' of the western world, it has been revealed. Britain
A vast study of youngsters' well-being in 30 industrialised nations ranks Britain among the worst for health, lifestyles and school standards relative to public spending levels.
Underage teenagers in
are more likely to get drunk than those in any other country, and Britain has among the highest proportions of teenage mothers and single-parent families. Britain
In 'risky' behaviour - drinking, smoking and teenage pregnancy -
's performance is worse than all nations other than Britain and Turkey . Mexico
Educational achievement is low given the billions being poured in by Labour, with more than one in ten 15 to 19-year-olds not in school, training or work - the fourth highest rate in the OECD, ahead only of
, Italy and Turkey . Social mobility in Mexico is also stalled, the report concludes. Britain
The report, published by the economic think-tank the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, compared data from 30 leading countries around the world on children's welfare.
It found that public spending on children is well above average, at more than £90,000 from birth to the age of 18. Family incomes are relatively healthy, too, ranking eighth out of the 30 countries studied.
But education results remained 'low relative to spending levels,' the report says, while the ability of children to break out of their class structures and earn more than their parents is poor.
... each new generation is more likely to find themselves in the same position in the earnings distribution as their parents,' it says. United Kingdom
Figures show that 33 per cent of 13 and 15-year-olds in
had been drunk at least twice, despite being too young to be served alcohol, compared with just 12 per cent of American youngsters and 14 per cent of French. Britain
Unlike in many other countries, drunkenness is more common among girls - with half of 15-year-olds having been drunk at least twice - than boys, with 44 per cent.
Teenage pregnancy is also far higher than average across the OECD. The
has the fourth highest teenage pregnancy rate after UK , Mexico and the Turkey . United States
, 23.4 teenage girls per 1,000 gave birth in 2005. Britain
ranks a poor 20th out of the 30 in terms of children's 'health and safety', with infant mortality rates higher than average and among the lowest numbers of toddlers being vaccinated against measles. Britain
The report criticises the Government for paying out generous benefits for single parents, saying that they keep them out of employment for too long. Once children start school at 4 or 5, benefits should be withdrawn, it says.
'There is little or no evidence that these benefits positively influence child well-being, while they discourage single-parent employment,' the report says.
Only 70 per cent of under-16s in
live with both parents, a figure which falls to 68 per cent in England and 66 in Scotland . This is well below the OECD average of 75 per cent. Wales
The report echoes research two years ago from UNICEF that put British children bottom of a list of the 21 most advanced countries.
That report cites family breakdown, drink, drugs, teenage sex and fear of violence as the issues confronting teenagers.
Shadow Schools Minister, Nick Gibb said: 'The low levels of social mobility and high levels of inequality are a serious cause for concern.
'The OECD is right that money needs to be targeted at poorer pupils if we are to close the educational gap between the top and the bottom.
'That is why two years ago, the Conservatives proposed a plan for education reform with an explicit pupil premium attached to children from less well-off backgrounds.
'Labour has failed a generation of children which is why we need a Conservative Government that takes the necessary steps to remove this block on opportunity.'
Joyce Moseley, chief executive of youth charity Catch22, said: 'The
has consistently scored poorly in OECD reports on the levels of young people not in work, education or training; teenage pregnancy and youth substance abuse. UK
'Unless we can start to improve this situation the
risks becoming the bad parent of UK Europe.
'The OECD makes it clear that although the
spends more than most on young people, the money is poorly targeted for older children. UK
'It is important that the good work done in the early years is backed up with consistency and targeted support for the most vulnerable young people.
'Now is the time for those of all political stripes to make a commitment to improving the situation of young people in the
Dawn Primarolo, the Children's Minister, said: ‘It is disappointing to see the
rated so low for risky behaviours.' UK
But she added: 'We have introduced a number of initiatives to help teenagers and their families make informed decisions about their behaviour, including the plans to introduce statutory Personal, Sexual and Health Education lessons to equip young people with the knowledge, understanding and practical skills to live healthy, safe, fulfilled and responsible lives.'