BNP Stall in Liverpool Attacked by Labour-Aligned Thugs but BNP Activists Arrested

British National Party supporters have been asked to urgently phone the Liverpool police station and complain about the KGB-style tactics employed by police over the weekend in arresting three party activists (including a middle-aged lady) after seven Labour-aligned thugs violently attacked a party stall.

“The numbers to call are 0151 777 4852, which is the St Anne’s Street police station where the lady, Hazel, is being held, and 0151 709 6010, which is the main Liverpool police station number,” said Mike Whitby, Liverpool organiser.

Mr Whitby said the astonishing turn of events, which “made one realise we are living under a KGB-style regime,” started on Saturday morning when he and three other BNP activists manned a stall in the city collecting signatures for the ‘bring our boys home’ campaign.

“I left briefly to go and book a meeting venue, leaving the two men, Peter and Andrew Tierney, and Hazel to continue collecting signatures,” Mr Whitby said.

“While I was gone, a crowd of Labour/UAF-aligned thugs approached the table and began jostling and threatening the activists,” he continued.

“The police, who were standing nearby, were asked to intervene, but refused to do anything. Then the thugs violently attacked the table, smashing it and assaulting Peter, who was thrown to the ground and beaten.

“Hazel, who is a petite woman, attempted to ward off the attack with her shopping bag, but the thugs completely destroyed the table,” Mr Whitby said.

“Faced with the overt violence, the police were forced to act, and chased the thugs, arresting six of them. They were calling us all sorts of names, mostly the usual meaningless epithets, and in response I called them ‘communist paedophiles.’

“To my astonishment, the police then also arrested me for using those words, and I was detained for ten hours at the police station.

“Eventually they released me without even taking my name or charging me with anything, and I went home,” Mr Whitby said.

“To our astonishment, the police then arrested Peter, Andrew and Hazel this morning (Monday) and have now detained them at different police stations around Liverpool,” he continued.

“Hazel is the sole carer for her severely disabled partner, and it is an outrage that she and the other two men have been arrested after they were attacked.

“We need as many people as possible to call the police straightaway and complain about this gross miscarriage of justice. The police are acting way beyond any normal call of duty and have clearly taken on a political role, akin to the KGB,” Mr Whitby said.

Further updates will follow as they become available.

BNP

EHRC’s Anti-White Agenda Exposed: No Action against Blacks-Only Police Association

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has refused to answer written questions submitted to it over six months ago on why it has not acted against a black police officers’ association that specifically forbids whites from being members.

The written complaint, submitted by British National Party Dagenham councillor Lawrence Rustem, was initiated after the Race Gestapo’s legal action was launched against the BNP over its membership criteria.

In August 2009, Cllr Rustem wrote to the EHRC asking if that body will “be taking action against the racially discriminatory policy of the Gloucester Black Police Association’s full membership policy which is designed to ‘benefit black staff employed by the Gloucestershire Constabulary?’

“Moreover, it is arguably the case that the GBPA is also acting in a discriminatory and therefore illegal manner, in that it seeks to maintain the ‘welfare of black staff’ and to ensure ‘service delivery to the black communities of Gloucestershire.’

“There is obviously no mention of the GBPA’s desire to ensure the ‘welfare of white staff’ or indeed to ensure ’service delivery to the white communities of Gloucestershire.’

“All of this can be evidenced from the GBPA’s membership criteria,” Cllr Rustem wrote. “One can only deduce that the GBPA is operating in a manner which is not conducive to ‘equality’ or indeed the ‘human rights’ of the indigenous community of Gloucestershire that such a service is and should be provided to all.

“As this is obviously a case of open discrimination by the GBPA, can the EHRC please advise me on what steps the Commission will be taking to address this issue?

“Furthermore, I would like confirmation of when action will be taken.

“Finally, can you please advise me of what action will be taken against other such organisations which cater specifically on ethnic grounds for people from ethnic minorities and when these proceedings will commence?” he wrote.

Cllr Rustem received a response — which was unsigned and anonymous — back from the EHRC’s Legal Enforcement Directorate on 1 October.

This letter said that “the Equality and Human Rights Commission Enforcement Directorate” will “carry out a preliminary assessment of the issues you have raised to enable the Commission to assess whether, and if so what, enforcement action is appropriate in this case.”

That was the last Cllr Rustem heard from the EHRC. “As one can see, the Equality and Human Rights Commission are very slow at responding when the role of equality is reversed and others seek ‘equality and human rights’ from them,” Cllr Rustem told BNP News.

“That must leave one with the obvious conclusion that in the eyes of the EHRC, some are more equal than others — rather much like the society that was endured in the abomination of humanity that was the former Soviet Union.”

British National Party