Saturday, 31 October 2009
Hundreds of anti-fascism protesters gathered in a city centre today to demonstrate against a planned protest by a far right-wing group.
Minor scuffles broke out between police and protesters as around 400 Unite Against Fascism activists descended on Leeds to challenge a march by the English Defence League.
The English Defence League was protesting about a number of other marches organised by British Islamic extremists.
As the two sides gathered in Leeds hundreds of officers, including a mounted section, were drafted in to keep them apart.
A police helicopter circled above while activists from Unite Against Fascism shouted slogans.
Demonstrators carried placards and banners and shouted 'Fascist scum off our streets'.
Scuffles broke out as police officers linked arms and moved rival groups of protesters away from each other.
There were minor flashpoints throughout the afternoon as the respective groups tried to break out from their restricted areas and confront each other, as early Christmas shoppers looked on.
At one point a missile was thrown (by uaf) and supporters spat at each other as they managed to get within a relatively short distance of each other.
A red flare (uaf again) lit by one of the protesters was grabbed by a police officer who managed to put it out.
One protester was grabbed by officers and dragged towards a nearby police van.
Several streets in the city were closed as the demonstrations took place.
Five people (uaf) were arrested for public order offences.
Later, in nearby City Square around 300 supporters from the English Defence League gathered amid a large police presence.
Activists sang England songs and God Save The Queen in the Square which was cordoned off by barriers and police officers.
Meanwhile in London, a planned march organised by radical Islamic extremists calling for sharia law to be imposed in the UK was called off amid security fears.
Anjem Choudary, leader of the radical Islamic sect Al Muhajiroun, said organisers Islam4UK had been forced to cancel the planned march from the Houses of Parliament to Trafalgar Square because of security concerns.
Hiding under hoodies and behind masks, flying their communist red flags, they descended on
This is the face of the so called ‘anti’ fascist. Labour and the union’s breed of brainwashed thugs.
Students, taught under the fascist Labour government, to hate and protest against anything that goes against their traitorous ideals, foreigners imported into Britain to ensure rising support for a corrupt government, those who have no idea what they are protesting about but go for a good punch-up and not forgetting the drug addled, morons that don’t even know what day it is but feel a sense of ‘togetherness’ when with likeminded scumbags.
But who gets the blame? Not the government and union funded boot boys, that’s for sure.
It’s about time people woke up to what this government has done to this country and tried to do to her people.
A new breed are being nurtured for the future, A breed that no longer thinks for itself. A breed that knows nothing of competition, failure and success. A breed that leaves school barely being able to read, write or add up. An apologetic breed that has no sense of British history or culture. A breed that bends over and takes it up the arse instead of standing up and fighting to keep Britain British.
It’s time to make a stand against the REAL fascists, the government and radical muslim. In fact it’s time to make a stand against anyone that doesn’t share the love we have for our country.
And it’s time to rid this country of the scum who are the cause of it all.
A MUSLIM march to promote sharia law in Britain looked set to end in violence today after rival demonstrators bombarded its hardline organisers with death threats.
London braced itself for clashes as the radical group Islam4UK claimed its enemies on the far right had threatened to disrupt their demo with violent attacks.
The Muslim fanatics are planning a massive march through the city as part of a campaign to bring the fundamental legal system to the UK.
But they said they were forced to change the route after hundreds of alleged threats from the British National Party and the English Defence League.
Last night the BNP denied its members had made threats and the EDL says it is simply holding its own demonstrations in London and Leeds.
But the presence of bitter political opponents in crowded city centres was bound to create a flashpoint.
In another Central London event, moderate Muslims were planning a demo to show Islam is a peaceful religion.
Islam4UK spokesman Anjem Choudary said they had been forced to change a previously well-publicised route through Westminster. They chose a secret location to avoid “credible” threats from right-wingers.
He said: “We are not a military organisation. We do not want to get involved in a physical confrontation. The main reason why we are relocating the march is because of the number of death threats and bomb threats we have received.
“We could take this with a pinch of salt but there are people out there – hooligans – who will get drunk and try to attack us. You cannot dismiss any kind of threats when many of our members will be there with women and children.”
Outlining their aims, Mr Choudary, who is Britain’s chief sharia law judge, said they wanted the system for everyone.
He dismissed criticism that the system imposes draconian penalties such as the stoning to death of unfaithful women.
The British-born former law student also predicted that sharia would be introduced “in our lifetime” – possibly as soon as 10 years.
Islam was the fastest-growing religion and Islam4UK road shows across the country had converted hundreds of people, he claimed. “If it happens in the next decade or in the next 50 years, that is something that you can’t predict,” he said.
“There is a tsunami of conversion. We are not going to make everyone become Muslims but people have the right to know there are alternatives.”
He said an Islamic flag will fly from Nelson’s Column, Trafalgar Square will become a place for Muslim worship, and table dancing clubs such as Stringfellows would become Islamic schools for women.
Punishments for breaching Islamic law would include public lashings and limbs would be amputated for serious offences such as theft.
He added: “We will not stop with this march. We will call upon Gordon Brown to give the authority to the leaders of the legal system to implement sharia law and we call upon the Queen to give up playing God.”
After that, exiled preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed delivered a 15-minute speech in a live telephone link from the Lebanon.
Bakri, who was banned from Britain in a crackdown on hate preachers after the 7/7 attacks, said Muslims should remain separate.
“We are living in a society which has man-made law. We don’t want ourselves to be integrated into the man-made system,” he said
Patrick Mercer, Tory MP and ex- Army officer, described Choudary’s plans as “extremely distasteful”. He added: “If anyone thinks those views are a step forward they are seriously deluded. They are repellent and repulsive.”
Last night Scotland Yard said it was aware of the radicals’ march and six counter-protests in London but had not been told of a change of route.
A spokesman added: “Without full details of what the group are planning it is hard for police to put in place an operation that allows the protest to go ahead while minimising the potential disruption to everyone else in central London wanting to go about their business as normal.”
MUM-of-three Beth Hoyle claims an Asda till worker refused to serve her because she was wearing a wristband backing injured troops.
Beth says the checkout lad told her the band for Help for Heroes - aided by The Sun - meant she supported the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And when she complained to a supervisor, he BACKED the Asian youth, saying he was entitled to his view.
Beth, 40, who has two brothers in the services, said the checkout worker told her he didn't want to serve her because of "what she was wearing."
Shocked Beth, of Whitworth, Greater Manchester, said that at first she thought the youth at Asda's Rochdale store meant a cross round her neck.
"He pointed to my Help for Heroes wristband and accused me of supporting the war. I told him it was nothing to do with the war, but about supporting our injured troops.
"I immediately complained to a supervisor, but he said it was his right not to serve me. I was disgusted."
An Asda spokeswoman said they were "shocked" by the claims but had found no evidence that the incident happened in their store.
She added: "We are big supporters of the Help for Heroes campaign and we sell the pin badges and wristband in hundreds of our stores."
Let Asda know how you feel and boycott their Rochdale store
Thursday, 29 October 2009
Let’s see you try!
With a bit of luck someone will take him out like they did another muslim nutcase in Dearborn, Michigan
Media in Sweden is having a tough time maintaining the propaganda as more and more people question the reasons for the mass vaccination. Now, authorities say that if not "80% of the population takes the shot, we risk 100 deaths from the swine flu". Most Swedes know that a normal flu season see several thousand dead from complications from the seasonal flu so the proportions of the propaganda coming from media and the government has caused a growing revolt against the massive attempts to scare people to take the poisonous injection.
We have earlier reported on the first death, the second death (also here), the third death and the fourth death in Sweden from the poisonous Pandemrix vaccin shot.
Today, Svenska Dagbladet reports that over 350 cases of side effects from the Pandemrix "swine flu" shot, has been recorded so far. It has also become clear that this shot contains the most deadly mix of substances of all the known vaccines manufactured against the so called "swine flu" H1N1 influenza. The official number of deaths from the "swine flu" vaccine is now five. And that is only those who have strong immediate reactons, the long term effects are usually never even investigated. If you would die from the shot two weeks after you took it, your death would not be considered to have anything to do with the vaccination. Severe health problems years after will of course be very hard to link to the poisonous injection. Even if these five official cases died within days, the official story is of course as expected: "none of these deaths has been confirmed to be linked to the vaccine".
In Aftonbladet, Jan Liliemark from The Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI) says: "- Nothing points to a connection. There will be more deaths. We are looking for a pattern, if the cases have something in common. We have so far not found any clear connections between them yet." Officially 198 cases of confirmed "swine flu" exist in Sweden today among a population of over 9 million. How these cases have been tested and determined is not clear.
As always with statistics like this, historically we know that very few of all real side effects are actually reported. Optimistically, up to ten per cent would be reported. It is also highly likely that deaths are being kept secret by the authorities so that the massive and hugely expensive vaccination program will not come to a complete stop. Too many have put their job, reputation and title at stake for the truth to be reported and published.
So far, three people have been reported dead from complications from getting the H1N1 virus. Five dead from the flu shot before the real vaccination campaign has even started should be an indication to question the vaccine and the strategy chosen but the authorities have so much prestige invested that it is unlikely it will ever happen - no matter how many will die from the poisonous injections.
The Swedish public are being kept in the dark about the most simple facts about the vaccinations. The questionable protection against the virus will only be for this present strain - any new mutations would immediately require a new vaccine for that strain. The new second wave of the new mutation is exactly what authorities warn about and use as an argument to take the poisonous injection.
Authorities are running out of arguments and completely idiotic arguments have been published the last week in Sweden. "There is less mercury in the shot than you get from eating mercury contaminated fish", "You might get sick from the vaccine but you should take that risk to ´save" someone who could die from getting the H1N1 infection from you", "It would be like killing someone to not take the shot out of solidarity" and "Mercury is not dangerous and also squalene is not dangerous, there is nothing called the Gulf War Syndrome and if there is, it has nothing to do with squalene because there was no squalene in the vaccines the US troops got", "German politicians will not get a different flu shot than the rest of the German population".
The number of flat out lies are so many, it is hard to keep track of them all.
The chief of The Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI), Annika Linde, says in the article: "- The Vaccine is principally natural to the body. The mercury was necessary but the amounts are very small. There are many who have been making statements without qualified knowledge. It is of course good that this type of matter is debated but some of the reporting is rather devastating for the possibility to vaccinate the whole population." You are welcome Mrs Linde.
The official line in Sweden is bordering to madness and the biggest medical scandal in the history of the nation has just started.
As usual I am in a hurry but I wanted to have a quick natter about the weather.
I remember as a child having snow anytime from November through to March. In fact in 1962/3 we had a freeze-up lasting three months, from December to March. It was the coldest winter on record.
A few years later I remember wading through blizzards with my mother. My father was in bed as he’d been on nights, so me and mum went out to collect the football pools money. I remember the cold harshness of the snow hitting my face, stinging my eyes and the hot aches on returning home and sitting too close to the open fire.
In 1976 we had 16 weeks of glorious sunshine. It was the hottest summer I have ever been through and the first time I had hay fever.
Also around the mid 1970’s we had hail in June. It was the size of golf balls and smashed many peoples property.
The next time I recall any snow was in the late 1980’s. It brought down telephone lines, we had no electricity and upon thawing, shops and homes were flooded.
We rarely have snow these days. Nothing to write home about anyway, but my brother in Denver, Colorado has reported six inches so far with a possible thirty six more to come. The last time this happened was in 1997.
Part of me feels jealous that the weather in America is how ours used to be; hot summers followed by freezing cold winters. On the other hand I am glad I don’t have to wrap up tight and walk around with a freezing chin and hands and feet I can no longer feel.
The reason I’m writing about this is in response to the controversial subject of ‘Global Warming’. If you look back over the years there is a pattern to our weather. It goes in cycles.
Is there really such a thing as Global Warming?
I think not.
We've all been there. A friend, new to the joys of computers, is having problems, rings you and asks you to guide them through the process. The problem being they don't actually listen and try to run before they can walk...
I think this guy should have been promoted, not fired. This is a true story from the Word Perfect Helpline, which was transcribed from a recording monitoring the customer care department. Needless to say the Help Desk employee was fired; however, he/she iscurrently suing the Word Perfect organization for 'Termination without Cause'.
Actual dialogue of a former WordPerfect Customer Support employee.
(Now I know why they record these conversations!):
Operator: 'Ridge Hall, computer assistance; may I help
Caller: 'Yes, well, I'm having trouble with WordPerfect.'
Operator: 'What sort of trouble??'
Caller: 'Well, I was just typing along, and
all of a sudden the words went away.'
Operator: 'Went away?'
Caller: 'They disappeared.'
Operator: 'Hmm So what does your screen
look like now?'
Caller: 'It's blank; it won't accept
anything when I type.'
Operator: 'Are you still in WordPerfect,
or did you get out??'
Caller: 'How do I tell?'
Operator: 'Can you see the C: prompt on the screen??'
Caller: 'What's a sea-prompt?'
Operator: 'Never mind, can you move your cursor around
Caller: 'There isn't any cursor: I told you, it won't
accept anything I type.'
Operator: 'Does your monitor have a power indicator??'
Caller: 'What's a monitor?'
Operator: 'It's the thing with the screen on it that
looks like a TV. Does it have a little light that tells
you when it's on??'
Caller: 'I don't know.'
Operator: 'Well, then look on the back of the monitor
and find where the power cord goes into it. Can you see
Caller: 'Yes, I think so.'
Operator: 'Great. Follow the cord to the plug, and tell
me if it's plugged into the wall.
Caller: 'Yes, it is.'
Operator: 'When you were behind the monitor, did you
notice that there were two cables plugged into the back
of it, not just one??'
Operator: 'Well, there are. I need you to look back
there again and find the other cable.'
Caller: 'Okay, here it is.'
Operator: 'Follow it for me, and tell me if it's plugged
securely into the back of your computer.'
Caller: 'I can't reach.'
Operator: 'Uh huh. Well, can you see if it is??'
Operator: 'Even if you maybe put your knee on something
and lean way over??'
Caller: 'Oh, it's not because I don't have the right
angle - it's because it's dark.'
Caller: 'Yes - the office light is off, and the only
light I have is coming in from the window.
Operator: 'Well, turn on the office light then.'
Caller: 'I can't.'
Operator: 'No? Why not??'
Caller: 'Because there's a power failure.'
Operator: 'A power......... A power failure? Aha, Okay,
we've got it licked now. Do you still have the boxes
and manuals and packing stuff your computer
Caller: 'Well, yes, I keep them in the closet.'
Operator: 'Good. Go get them, unplug your system and
pack it up just like it was when you got it. Then take
it back to the store you bought it from.'
Caller: 'Really? Is it that bad?'
Operator: 'Yes, I'm afraid it is.'
Caller: 'Well, all right then, I suppose. What do I
Operator: 'Tell them you're too f ---ing stupid to own
A new European nationalist bloc consisting of five parties have announced that they are to form an alliance in opposition to the European Union and globalisation.
Hungary’s Jobbik, France’s National Front, Italy’s Three-Colour Flame, Sweden’s National Democrats and Belgium’s National Front formed the Alliance of European National Movements. The British National Party, Austria’s Freedom Party as well as groups from Spain and Portugal will soon join the bloc, it was announced.
The bloc argues that globalisation “will homogenise independent cultures” and is opposed to “supranational bodies like the European Union which seek to limit the rights of individual countries.”
Marc Abramsson, president of Sweden’s National Democrats, said over the weekend that this was an “important step … for the renaissance of sovereign nations. It is a struggle for our own culture and heritage.
“Globalists would like to have one world, with one language and one culture. Their interest is to get money from selling the same products all over the world,” Mr Abramsson said.
Representatives from the five parties signed an agreement detailing their common goals, such as advocating for a confederation of sovereign states to replace the EU, increasing support for families to reverse Europe’s population loss and opposing “religious, political, economic or financial imperialism.”
* Nothing now stands in the way of the final implementation of the Lisbon Treaty before the end of this year — and the moment of truth for the Tory party when they must finally announce their policy publicly.
Czech president Vaclav Klaus today assured the Czech prime minister Jan Fischer that he will sign the law ratifying the Lisbon Treaty.
Making the announcement, Mr Fischer said that Mr Klaus will sign the document if the Czech constitutional court rules that the treaty is compatible with the country’s constitution and if the Czech Republic is given an opt-out from the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The latter is a component of the treaty.
Mr Fischer said that he received an oral assurance from the president on Tuesday evening and that Mr Klaus had given an undertaking that he had no further demands to make.
The Czech constitutional court is set to rule on the treaty’s compatibility with the Czech constitution next Tuesday, 3 November. Mr Fischer said that he expects the court to make a judgment on that day.
Tomáš Langášek, the court’s spokesman, has said that it is “possible that the constitutional court will have to take more time, but I don’t expect so.”
This means that unless something completely remarkable happens, the Lisbon Treaty and the new EU constitution will be fully approved by all EU member nations before the end of November, with implementation on track for the beginning of January next year.
The cowardly Conservative Party leadership has consistently refused to take a final policy position on the matter, claiming meekly that if the Lisbon Treaty was already in place if they came to power, they “would not leave it there.”
The reality is, as first pointed out on this website and then copied over by many media observers, that there can be no “renegotiation” of the constitution once it is ratified.
The only way out of the new EU constitution will be to leave the EU. There is no alternative — and the Tory moment of truth has drawn a bit closer.
Concerned British Citizens, in conjunction with Nationalist Groups and and other Truth Seeking people have launched a campaign earlier this week for a National Boycott of the British Press and Media.
The campaign is called "One Million to Boycott press/media lies" and contact details and further information can be found on their Facebook Group
"The British People at large will no longer remain silent in the face of the continued attacks by The Establishment Press in publishing outright lies, half truths and twisted reporting about patriotic nationalist organisations such as the British National Party, the English Defence League and the Welsh Defence League.
People joining the group pledge to boycott all National and Local newspapers for failing in their duty in reporting the "news" in a fair and unbiased fashion.
The group, although only launched a few short days ago, currently has in excess of 1,000 members who have agreed to no longer fund a biased press by not buying the their blatant propaganda sheets.
By depriving The Establishment Press of revenue, the Group intends to send a clear message to the Editors and owners of these organisations that they must either change their ways and return to reporting the news honestly or face considerable loss of income and possible closure as a result.
Already the pledged loss of income to to the Press Barons will be at least £163,200 as a result of just 1,000 members joining the group. Once the group reaches 10,000 the cost to the press will be close on £2 million and the group will continue to campaign and recruit until they have at least
Should the press continue to ignore the Voice of the People calling for fair reporting, then the Group will open another front by targeting advertisers who publish in the Propaganda Press by peaceful protest outside their offices and outlets."
Press Release Ends. For more information go here
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
To many people shopping is something they enjoy. To a nationalist it is a nightmare.
I have always bought what I can from my local market, but since my hours have increased, shopping has to either be done at silly o’clock or online and delivered.
I tried online shopping and half the items were either missing or ‘substituted’. Each time I stated that I didn’t want a substitute, each time they sent one.
Now, for some this could be a good idea but not in my experience. I mean, how the hell can a family sized deep apple pie be substituted with a pack of six tiny apple pies? And why the hell would someone replace fresh green beans with a can of peas?
So I thought ‘sod it’. No matter what the time is I will go myself. Not as easy as I thought considering I work all hours God sends, including weekends.
Absolutely shattered from a 13 hour shift and 70 hour week, I hobbled to the nearest 24 hour Tesco. And this is where my nightmare began.
On reflection, the variety of goods is impressive. The problem is finding anything remotely British.
My first complaint is with the fruit section. The majority of fruit is imported from overseas. Fair enough if you want something exotic, but why have 10 varieties of French apple?
For the record,
Back to apples. Out of a whole row of apples I found only one English apple. Whoopie-do! Of course, it is a variety I do not even like so I go without.
Now for the meat. I could never be a vegetarian, I enjoy eating meat far too much. What bugs me about stores like Tesco is the way they try and trick you with the packaging. You pick up what you think are British sausages or bacon when in fact they have only been packed in
Pork products start life in
Now for other meats, halal and kosher. I also asked a couple of Tesco workers how I could tell if a meat was halal or kosher; there are no halal or kosher sections in my local Tesco but that doesn’t mean they don’t sell them. They sell everything else.
For halal or kosher to be permissible the animal has to be alive and healthy. The jugular vein, carotid artery and windpipe have to be severed by a razor sharp knife by a single swipe and any flowing blood of the carcass should be completely drained. In other words the animal bleeds to death and is not stunned beforehand.
I do not agree to something being killed in such a barbaric way and will not buy it, but how am I to know if it’s been slaughtered in this way? After all they are serving halal meat to our school children without then knowing so why not sell it in shops without telling us?
Once again I was told by the staff that they didn’t know. To be quite honest, they don’t know much. I could go on and on about other items but the story is always the same and after about an hour and a half I gave up and left the shop with bread and a few chocolate cakes to keep me going until tomorrows market.
The moral of this story?
Only use stores such as Tesco if absolutely necessary. Support your local butcher and grocer. It may cost a few pence more but you know you are supporting your fellow countrymen, you know the product will be top class and it will be fresh.
BNP Chairman Nick Griffin speaks of the 25,000 new enquiries since Question Time just under a week ago.
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
Sometimes you have to show your disgust at what is happening by taking to the streets.
Although the BNP don't protest, the EDL do and here is their new protest promotion video against the vile anjem choudary and his march for shariah.
When you've watched the video visit Time Out London and read Michael Hodges disgraceful anti-British article (2007) on the future of islam in London and also articles to the right of it.
Film from the 2nd World War, the words of churchill and some very interesting comments from a video by THE CRUSADER.
Watch and believe that if we don't wake up we will lose our country.
We should have listened to Churchill!
Video and comments by iamlegion4wearemany
The police officer who was in charge of policing the protest against the BNP's Red, White and Blue festival in August is holding a public meeting for local residents.
Chief Superintendent Garry Sherwood, Commander for Derbyshire Constabulary's 'A' Division, which covers Amber Valley, Erewash and parts of Bolsover district council areas, is holding a public meeting for the residents of Codnor and Denby.
The meeting will be held on Monday November 2 at the Denby C of E School on Church Street, Denby and will begin at 6.30pm.
Ch Supt Sherwood said: "I want people to have the opportunity to tell us what they thought about the policing of the BNP event and the protest against it.
"The Chief Constable Mick Creedon held a public meeting beforehand and we are keen to know if there are any lessons we can learn to improve they way we deal with similar matters in the future."
Anyone wishing to attend, to ask questions or to share any concerns about any future events, should contact police on 0345 123 33 33 to register.
The hall holds a maximum of 75 people so there will be a limit on the number who can attend.
Possible links between mass immigration and some crimes were censored from a keynote government report, the Standard can reveal.
The report originally contained passages highlighting the risk that organised criminals had exploited higher migration.
But they were taken out of the published version, a milestone study that shifted Labour policy towards encouraging economic migrants.
Published by the Home Office in 2001, the 80-page report - Migration, A Social and Economic Analysis - has been criticised for painting too a rosy picture of the impact of immigration. The draft shown to the Evening Standard reveals it went through several changes that removed paragraphs that could have been seized upon by critics.
The most striking was the removal of the section headed "Criminal behaviour", written as part of a chapter on the impact of migration.
It is understood that the passage on crime was removed because Downing Street was "nervous" that critics including extremists could seize on such candid remarks.
Another section cut proposed a cross-government "communications strategy on migration" to promote a more positive attitude among members of the public and to rebut media myths.
Moreover, in the draft it was asserted that Britain's record towards Jews fleeing Hitler's Nazi regime was "positively shameful in some respects". It also said racism towards black migrants in past years had come "not just from extremists or working class communities, but from politicians and policy-makers at the highest level".
Both comments were airbrushed from the published version. Damian Green, the Conservative immigration spokesman, said the disclosures showed a "disgraceful" attempt to massage the findings of the report.
"With every day that passes it becomes increasingly clear that the Government tried to deceive the British people about immigration policy," he said. "This is a disgraceful episode."
The report has already been at the centre of a row this week after claims that officials involved in the review of immigration policy seemed to be motivated by party political considerations. It was written by members the PIU think tank set up by Tony Blair under the lead of Jonathan Portes, 44, now the senior economic adviser at the Cabinet Office.
The missing section warned: "Migration has opened up new opportunities for organised crime." However, it said migrants were not more likely to be criminals, despite foreign nationals forming a higher proportion of the prison population than of the general population. The disparity, it stressed, was almost entirely caused by foreign visitors held for drugs smuggling at ports and airports, and nothing to do with settled migrants.
It reported: "There is emerging evidence that the circumstances in which asylum seekers are living is leading to criminal offences, including fights and begging."
A Cabinet Office spokesman denied that any political pressure was brought to bear on Mr Portes and his team.
"Objectivity and impartiality have always been core values of the civil service," he said.
Passages that were missing from the report
There are three ways in which migrant criminality may differ from that of the general population:
* The international criminal who travels across borders to pursue criminal activity, for whom screening at ports of entry is increasingly the focus of international cooperation between police forces to detect on entry.
* Organised crime identified with a particular migrant group, including commercial fraud and trafficking in drugs, in illegal migrants and in women — also the focus of attention by police and immigration staff.
* Crime associated with conditions of migration and reception, including recovery of debts by migrant-smugglers, marriage rackets, breaches of immigration control and crime associated with the migrant's circumstances (lack of work, hostel living conditions).
* Taken from Preliminary Report on Migration, 11 July 2000, written by officials in Tony Blair's Performance and Innovation Unit. This section was omitted from the public version of the report, Migration, A Social and Economic Analysis, published by the Cabinet Office in 2001.
Monday, 26 October 2009
The outrageous truth slips out: Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us
So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened.
Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?
The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.
There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.
This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.
In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised 'firm control over immigration' and in 2005 it promised a 'crackdown on abuse'. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages.
But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until 'at least February last year', when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.
This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.
Unless policies change, over the next 25 years some seven million more will be added to Britain's population, a rate of growth three times as fast as took place in the Eighties.
Such an increase is simply unsustainable. Britain is already one of the most overcrowded countries in Europe. But now look at the real reason why this policy was introduced, and in secret. The Government's 'driving political purpose', wrote Neather, was 'to make the UK truly multicultural'.
It was therefore a politically motivated attempt by ministers to transform the fundamental make-up and identity of this country. It was done to destroy the right of the British people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language and traditions.
It was done to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another 'multicultural' identity in its place. And it was done without telling or asking the British people whether they wanted their country and their culture to be transformed in this way.
Spitefully, one motivation by Labour ministers was 'to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date'.
Even Neather found that particular element of gratuitous Left-wing bullying to be 'a manoeuvre too far'.
Yet apart from this, Neather sees nothing wrong in the policy he has described. Indeed, the reason for his astonishing candour is he thinks it's something to boast about. Mass immigration, he wrote, had provided the 'foreign nannies, cleaners and gardeners' without whom London could hardly function.
What elitist arrogance! As if most people employ nannies, cleaners and gardeners. And what ignorance. The argument that Britain is better off with this level of immigration has been conclusively shown to be economically illiterate.
Neather gave the impression that most immigrants are Eastern Europeans. But these form fewer than a quarter of all immigrants.
And the fact is that, despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, schools in areas of very high immigration find it desperately difficult to cope with so many children who don't even have basic English. Other services, such as health or housing, are similarly being overwhelmed by the sheer weight of numbers.
But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was to destroy Britain's identity and transform it into a multicultural society where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country's.
A measure of immigration is indeed good for a country. But this policy was not to enhance British culture and society by broadening the mix. It was to destroy its defining character altogether.
It also conveniently guaranteed an increasingly Labour-voting electorate since, as a recent survey by the Electoral Commission has revealed, some 90 per cent of black people and three-quarters of Asians vote Labour.
In Neather's hermetically sealed bubble, the benefits of mass immigration were so overwhelming he couldn't understand why ministers had been so nervous about it.
They were, he wrote, reluctant to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all to Labour's core white working class vote. So they deliberately kept it secret.
They knew that if they told the truth about what they were doing, voters would rise up in protest. So they kept it out of their election manifestos.
It was indeed a conspiracy to deceive the electorate into voting for them. And yet it is these very people who have the gall to puff themselves up in self-righteous astonishment at the rise of the BNP.
No wonder Jack Straw was so shifty on last week's Question Time when he was asked whether it was the Government's failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support for the BNP.
A militant Islamic group was given more than £113,000 of taxpayers money to run a nursery and two primary schools.
Members of Hizb ut-Tahrir used the cash to teach children as young as five about their beliefs.
The group - which Tony Blair promised to ban after the 7/7 attacks on London - were given £113,411 to provide the three educational centres in Tottenham and Slough.
Ministers are today expected to come under pressure to investigate why the money was provided.
The group is regarded as an 'organisation of concern' by the Home Office.
Tory MP Patrick Mercer, chairman of the parliamentary sub-committee on counter-terrorism, today condemned grants to schools with connections to extremist groups.
Mr Mercer, MP for Newark and Retford, said: 'Hizb ut-Tahrir may not be illegal but it has definitely been identified as part of the conveyor-belt to terrorism.
That Hizb is involved with vulnerable youngsters is deeply disturbing.
Sunday, 25 October 2009
A GANG of convicted are back on the streets of Birmingham after being released early from jail.
Hamid Elasmar, from Edgbaston, Zahoor Iqbal, from Kingstanding, and Mohammed Irfan, from Ward End, were all caged less than two years ago.
They had been jailed for between three and seven years after helping to plan the kidnap of a squaddie on Broad Street and behead him “like a pig” in a lock-up garage.
But the men have now been released early for good behaviour.
A SENIOR Midland church leader today laid down the gauntlet to the politically correct brigade – by calling on all Christians to wear crosses in the run-up to Christmas.
The Anglican Bishop of Lichfield told followers to flaunt their faith by wearing crosses and fish badges, and not to be intimidated by complaining PC campaigners.
The Rt Revd Jonathan Gledhill said Christians should wear the symbols of their faith with pride, and not fall victim to killjoy discrimination.
“Christians should not be intimidated into putting away their neck crosses or lapel badges,” he said.
“The Christian roots to our governance should not be nibbled away without discussion.
“We’re just getting to the season when the papers like to report on local councils who, out of concern for ethnic minorities, have banned Christmas in favour of Winterval, or another silly name.
“This year that kind of story is likely to be more than matched by stories of big firms sacking those people who want to wear a cross, a fish lapel badge or some other sign of the Christian faith.
“It is sheer ignorance of course.
“Ethnic minorities are far more anxious about the rampant secularism and commercialism that erodes all Christian standards than they are about their host country properly celebrating its Christian foundations.
“No-one goes to a Muslim country and expects local councils to silence the mosques out of sensitivity to Christians.
“It wouldn’t be a bad thing if in December we all wore a fish badge or cross necklaces and sent out a loud message that Christians aren’t going to disappear quietly from the marketplace or put away our crib figures in a hurry.”
The bishop’s comments come as a report reveals three out of four employers will not be putting up Christmas decorations in the workplace this year for fear of offending staff.
And a survey shows that just one in 10 Christmas cards sold in Britain contains religious messages or imagery.
The Rt Revd Gledhill’s Winterval remark is a side swipe at Birmingham City Council who, in 1998, announced the Christmas holiday should be renamed Winterval to be ‘more inclusive’.
Such was the level of controversy generated by the barmy decision that red-faced council chiefs dropped the tag a year later.
A number of Christians have recently been ordered to stop wearing crosses for politically correct, or health and safety, reasons.
Nurse Shirley Chaplain says she was told to stop wearing a cross around her neck because it could be dangerous. The 54 year-old is facing the sack at Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, where she has worked for 31 years.
Saturday, 24 October 2009
This is a response by SperoPatria to the BBC, the political elite, and the mainstream media who have tried everything in their power to smear Nick Griffin and the British National Party over the last week. The Question Time audience was vastly biased, obviously filled with a few stooges I expect, and so pathetic also that all they spent for one hour was hurling misquoted quotes at Mr Griffin. Yes the man has a past and is not perfect like any politician, but you did not address real issues that most concern the British people, and you are still happy to refuse the English, Irish, Scots, and Welsh an identity, now that is 'Racism'. You only make us stronger. Thank you.
The British National Party believes in telling the truth, even if it is sometimes uncomfortable to hear or offensive to those who would rather bury their heads in the sand than face real problems in our society. But while we often pass quite critical comment on the impact of immigration, multi-culturalism and alien religions on the indigenous people of our lands, we have no animosity towards immigrants, their descendants or the followers of non-native religions. Nor do we intend to encourage others to feel such animosity, or believe that anything we have to say is likely to 'stir up hatred' against anyone.
In fact, we believe that by providing a peaceful and Constitutional outlet for the anger and the frustration felt by millions of our people over the undemocratic transformation of our country by our political masters, the BNP actually defuses tensions. Where there is 'hate' we seek to turn it into righteous anger and political action against the only people who deserve to be hated - the politicians who use our taxes to turn our country into a place where we often feel like strangers in our own land.
-YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED BY THE BNP -
Video and post by SperoPatra