Islamist hatemongers funded by the taxpayer with money earmarked to combat terrorism

Hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money earmarked to counter terrorism was instead handed to extremist groups, it emerged last night.

Radical Islamists were bankrolled with money which should have been used to combat their anti-Western ideology, a Government report concluded.

The money was spent as part of the Prevent programme which was funded with hundreds of millions of pounds to try to stop young Muslims from becoming radicalised.

The report also revealed:

• Hundreds of thousands of pounds were wasted on pointless sports clubs or ‘cohesion schemes’.
• More than 1,100 people were reported to the authorities after displaying extremist sympathies – a quarter of whom were children.
• The astonishing scale of Islamic teaching outside the mainstream school system in up to 2,000 madrassas attended by an estimated 100,000 children.

Home Secretary Theresa May launched a withering attack on the failures of Prevent, set up by Labour in the wake of the July 7 attacks in 2005. She said it was ‘flawed’ and vowed to end all funding for extremist groups.

In a statement to Parliament, she said: ‘It failed to tackle the extremist ideology that not only undermines the cohesion of our society, but also inspires would be terrorists to seek to bring death and destruction to our towns and cities.

‘And in trying to reach out to those at risk of radicalisation, funding sometimes even reached the very extremist organisations that Prevent should have been confronting. We will not make the same mistakes. Under this Government, public money will not be provided to extremist organisations.’

Mrs May also pledged not to give money to anyone who doesn’t support British values of democracy, human rights and equality before the law. ‘If they do not accept these fundamental and universal values, then we will not work with them and we will not fund them,’ she said.

Critics of the Prevent programme maintained that the way the money was handed out, through police and councils, meant there was a lack of proper checks.

The report said that audit trails for Prevent money were so bad that as yet unidentified sums of money may have reached extremists. It also found that 13 per cent of Prevent funding in a single year went to ‘sports and recreation activities’ including boxing and football clubs.

The Home Office report concluded: ‘The review found no evidence to indicate widespread, systematic or deliberate funding of extremist groups, either by the Home Office of by local authorities or police forces.

‘But there have been cases where groups whom we would now consider to support an extremist ideology have received funding.’

It added: ‘Records and audit trails for Prevent funding have not always been comprehensive. It is therefore possible that Prevent funding has reached extremist groups of which we are not yet aware.’

The report calls on councils, universities and schools to prevent terror propagandists from holding speaking events in public venues.

Ministers have also pledged to increase their efforts to reform terrorist prisoners on their release from jail, and to stop wasting money overseas on programmes with no value to UK security.

The report identified 25 priority areas in England, including Birmingham, Blackburn, Leicester and 16 London boroughs, which will be targeted with counter-terror funding.

Emma Boon, campaign director of the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: ‘The national government has had enough trouble ensuring that funding to promote cohesion doesn’t end up in the wrong hands.

‘Local councils had far less experience and ability to screen potential recipients and so were unlikely to avoid making expensive mistakes. Letting them do that without proper monitoring of where the money went was downright reckless.’

More than 300 children have been identified by the authorities as potential terrorists over the past three years, the report reveals.

The figure comprises an astonishing 55 under-12s, and another 290 aged up to 16.

They were referred to the Government’s ‘Channel’ project because they were found to hold extreme views, or be at risk of turning to radicalism.

A total of 1,120 people were referred to the programme between April 2007 and December 2010, the Home Office report says.

It also reveals the existence of 2,000 religious schools or madrassas in the UK, thought to be attended by up to 100,000 children.

These are unregulated and teach Arabic and the Koran, the Islamic holy book.

A BBC Panorama investigation last year reported madrassas using textbooks with anti-Semitic and anti-gay material.

Here are just a few of the extremist Islamist groups the Government has been funding:

Muslim Council of Britain

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and related groups were handed £550,985 over a period of three years by the Department of Communities and Local Government. In March 2009 the Government suspended links with the MCB and demanded one of its leaders should be sacked for allegedly supporting violence against Israel.

The Cordoba Foundation

The Cordoba Foundation, an independent research organisation which advises leading Muslim groups and which was founded by Anas al-Tikriti, former president of the Muslim Association of Britain, has received ‘anti-extremist’ funding.

The group, which David Cameron once described as a front for the extremist Muslim Brotherhood, was given £38,000 by Tower Hamlets council in East London in 2007 for two projects: A Muslim media project and a Muslim debating society which held a debate entitled ‘Has Political Participation Failed British Muslims?’

Dr Abdul Wahid, the leader of radical group Hizb-ut-Tahrir (an extremist group which refuses to condemn suicide bombers and has called for the destruction of Israel and which Tony Blair promised to outlaw) was invited to speak. As a result, the Foundation was required to return some of the money given to it.

The Islamic Foundation

DESCRIBED by the BBC’s Panorama as an ‘influential’ outpost of militant Islamist ideology, it was set up by members of Pakistan’s Jamaat-i-Islami opposition party, which campaigns for Pakistan to become an Islamic state governed by Sharia holy law. Panorama claimed the foundation promoted fundamentalist materials.
iEngage

The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia used a body called iEngage as the group’s secretariat. iEngage is an organisation of Islamist sympathisers which has repeatedly defended extremists. It called on the Government to revoke a ban on a hardline foreign preacher who has said that ‘every Muslim should be a terrorist’.

The STREET project

Lambeth Council gave an unspecified sum to the STREET project, run by Abdul Haqq Baker, the chairman of the Brixton Mosque and Islamic Cultural Centre.

The project was aimed at ‘reaching out’ to young Muslims who were susceptible to violent extremism, but Baker is an adherent of Salafism, a hard line form of Islam seen as in conflict with liberal democracy.

Green Lane and Central mosques

Government money was given to Birmingham’s Green Lane and Central mosques. They featured in an undercover Channel 4 Dispatches programme in which imams were recorded making inflammatory comments.

One preacher, Abu Usamah, called for gay people to be executed and was quoted as saying: ‘If I were to call homosexuals perverted, dirty, filthy dogs who should be murdered, that’s my freedom of speech, isn’t it?’.

Global Peace and Unity

Over four years the Met Police gave £26,500 sponsorship to the annual Muslim gathering, Global Peace and Unity. But one of the event’s main speakers had suggested the Queen’s decision to award a knighthood to Salman Rushdie was enough to justify suicide bombings by Muslims.

The Met also employed as an anti-terrorism adviser Mohamed Ali Harrath, who was wanted by Interpol and authorities in his native Tunisia because of his links to an alleged terror organisation.

DM

35 radicals trained for terrorism at British mosques

Britain's mosques became an international haven for extremists who enjoyed state benefits while being trained for terrorism, leaked documents show.

The WikiLeaks files, written by U.S. military chiefs, reveal that at least 35 Guantanamo terrorists were radicalised in London mosques before being sent to fight against the West.

This is believed to be more than any other Western country.

Of these, just 17 were British nationals or had been granted asylum, while 18 had travelled from abroad – cementing Britain’s reputation as a global training camp for terrorists.

U.S. intelligence officers describe Finsbury Park mosque, in North London, as a ‘haven for Islamic extremists from Morocco and Algeria’ and ‘an attack planning and propaganda production base’.

After their UK trip they were then flown to Pakistan and Afghanistan where they were taught to fight and make bombs. The leaked documents also show that an Al Qaeda ‘assassin’ accused of bombing two churches and a luxury hotel in Pakistan was at the same time working for MI6.

Adil Hadi al Jazairi Bin Hamlili was captured in 2003 and sent to Guantanamo Bay where interrogators were convinced that he was an informer for British intelligence.

U.S. intelligence reports describe the 35-year-old Algerian citizen as a ‘facilitator, courier, kidnapper, and assassin for Al Qaeda’. CIA interrogators found him ‘to have withheld important information from …British Secret Intelligence Service … and to be a threat to U.S. and allied personnel in Afghanistan and Pakistan’.

He has been returned to Algeria but it is not clear whether he will stand trial there.

REVENGE PLOT TO NUKE BRITAIN

Interrogators at Guantanamo Bay uncovered serious plots to unleash chemical and nuclear weapons on the West, the WikiLeaks documents show.

According to detainees’ confessions, Al Qaeda mastermind Kalid Sheikh Mohammed claimed they had hidden a nuclear bomb in Britain which would be detonated if Osama Bin Laden was captured or killed.

Detainees admitted that Mohammed, currently facing trial over the 9/11 terrorist attacks, was involved in a plot to attack U.S. atomic plants and unleash a ‘nuclear hellstorm’.

According to the files, a Libyan detainee and close friend of Bin Laden, Abu Al-Libi, ‘has knowledge of Al Qaeda possibly possessing a nuclear bomb’.

Another told his interrogators the bombers would be ‘Europeans of Arab or Asian descent’.

The WikiLeaks documents, published by the Daily Telegraph, also reveal that 16 detainees sent back to Britain were regarded as ‘high risk’ by the U.S. authorities and capable of plotting acts of terror.

Yet each has been paid £1million of public money by the Government to compensate them for their unlawful detention.

The documents point to the crucial role played by London-based preachers such as Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza in the suspected indoctrination of extremists, before they were dispatched around the world to plot terror attacks. They describe Qatada as ‘the most successful recruiter in Europe’ and ‘a focal point for extremist fundraising [and] recruitment’.

Despite this, the London cleric and Al Qaeda’s chief European agent was paid £2,500 for being ‘unlawfully detained’ by the British Government, after being held indefinitely without trial following 9/11.

A ruling found that keeping him in Belmarsh prison, while he refused to return to his native Jordan, breached his human right to a fair trial. The Government is trying to deport him to Jordan, where he has been sentenced to jail in his absence on terror charges.

Meanwhile, Hamza is named as encouraging ‘his followers to murder non-Muslims’, in the documents, and yet continues to fight deportation to the U.S. because of Europe’s liberal human rights laws.

Extradition proceedings began six years ago, but he appealed to Strasbourg on the grounds that this would breach his human right to a fair trial because he would be given an ‘excessive’ sentence. The taxpayer continues to fund his stay in Belmarsh prison while his wife and eight children are claiming £680 a week in benefits and living in a council home in West London.

Three other mosques and an Islamic centre are also highlighted by senior commanders as places where young Muslim men were turned into potential terrorists.

Many obtained EU passports from other European countries such as France, but then travelled on to Britain to take advantage of the generous asylum system. The leaks help explain why U.S. intelligence services regard extremists in Britain as the greatest threat to American security.

The CIA is still so concerned about militant recruitment in the UK that it operates its own intelligence network and recruits its own agents among the Muslim population in Britain.

In a statement, the Pentagon said: ‘The previous and current administrations have made every effort to act with the utmost care and diligence in transferring detainees from Guantanamo.’

DM

A German's View on Islam

This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read.

The author is said to be Dr. Emanuel Tanay, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. His references to past history are accurate and clear.

A German's View on Islam

A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care.

I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 40 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.

And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points:

• Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.
• Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them and the end of their world will have begun.
• Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts--the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit. Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this, think about it, and share it - before it's too late.

Thanks to Derek for forwarding this to me.

Muslim March for Shariah in the UK - 25th March 2011

Where are the UAF when muslims march against the British?

The British National Party's Nick Griffin Visits Downing Street

As Britain prepares to attack Libya, Mr Nick Griffin drops into Downing Street to deliver the signatures of 10,000 people who signed the 'Bring Our Boys Home' petition.

For once the interview appeared unbiased.

What islam IS NOT!

TRANSCRIPT

If you live in Western society and are worried about the Islamization of your country this video has a message for you. What Islam is NOT was published the 21th of April 2008 in FRONTPAGEMAGAZINE.COM from the book 'Slavery, Terrorism and Islam' by Dr. Peter Hammond.

Islam is neither a religion nor a cult. It is complete and total 100 percent system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economical, social and military components. The religious part is used to camouflage all the other components. Islamization happens when enough Muslims are in a country in order to protest for their religious rights

If political correct, tolerant romantic and multiethnic societies agree to the Muslim's demand for religious rights and grant those rights they ALSO GRANT THE RIGHTS FOR THE OTHER COMPONENTS at the same time. This is how it works...

As long as the Muslim population of a country remains below 2% most people see the Muslims as a peaceful and non-threatening minority. This is the case in the following countries... (UPDATED 2010)

United States 2.5 % - Australia 1.6 % - Canada 2.0 % - China 1.6 % - Italy 2.1 % - Norway 3.0 %

If the Muslim population reaches 2% to 5% they start to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and other dissatisfied and unhappy groups. Islam focuses on the recruitment of prisoners, ex-convicts and street gangs

(UPDATED 2010) Denmark 4.0 % - Germany 5.4 % - United Kingdom 3.9 % - Spain 2.3 % - Thailand 5.8 %

From 5% onwards Muslims influence the rest of the country more than their numbers suggest they will insist on the introduction of Halal products (permissible according to Islamic law). This will create jobs for Muslims in the preparation of those foods. They will pressurize supermarket chains to feature these products. Supermarket chains who do not comply will receive threats. This is the situation in countries like...

(UPDATED 2010) France 12.2 % - Philippines 5.1 % - Sweden 5.4 % - Switzerland 6.4 % - Netherlands 5.1 % - Trinidad and Tobago 6.0 %

At this point Muslims will try to establish Sharia in the enclaves they have set up in cities and towns. The final goal of Islam is to establish Sharia all over the world. If Muslims reach 10% of the population they will start to ignore the laws and legal system in order to complain about their living condition. An example is Paris where Muslims will burn cars. Every action from Non-Muslims that insults Islam will lead to demonstrations, unrest and threat. This happened in Amsterdam and other cities after protests against the Mohammed cartoons and other films which expose Islam and show the consequences of Sharia law. Such tensions are a usual occurrence in countries such as...

(UPDATED 2010) Guyana 10.2 % - India 14.5 % - Israel 16.7 % - Kenya 10.1 % - Russia 17.6 %

If the population of Muslims has reached 20% there are hair-trigger riots (riots for insignificant reasons) the recurring formation of jihad militia, sporadic killings and the burning down of churches and synagogues...

Ethiopia 33.7 %

From 40% on you will have widespread massacres, chronic terrorist attacks and permanent militia warfare

You can see this in the following countries...

(UPDATED 2010) Bosnia 45.2 % - Chad 55.8 % - Lebanon 60.6 %

After 60% you will have boundless persecution of all Non-Muslim religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing, the use of sharia as a weapon and the introduction of Jizya (the tax on infidels)

This occurs in countries such as...

(UPDATED 2010) Albania 79.9 % - Malaysia 66.9 % - Qatar 78.5 % - Sudan 71.3 %

From 80% on you can see daily intimidation and violent jihad, state run ethnic cleansing and genocide, as these governments want to cast out all Non-Muslims in order to get to become 100% Muslim.

This is the situation in...

(UPDATED 2010) Bangladesh 89.6 % - Egypt 94.6 % - Gaza strip 99.3 % - Indonesia 88.2 % - Iran 99.4 % - Iraq 99.0 % - Jordan 98.2 % - Morocco 99.0 % - Pakistan 98.2 % - Palestinian territories 98.0 % - Syria 92.2 % - Tajikistan 98.1 % - Turkey 99.8 % - United Arab Emirates 76.2 %

At 100% a country is 'Dar as-Salam' (House of Islamic Peace). At this point there is supposed to be peace because everyone is Muslim. Children will be indoctrinated in Quran Schools. The quran should become the definiton of life.

This is the case in countries like...

Afghanistan 100% - Saudi Arabia 100% - Somalia 100% - Yemen 100%

Of course that is not the case and there is no peace in these countries. The most radical Muslims intimidate the rest, fuel hatred and satisfy their bloodlust by killing less radical Muslims

A quote from the book 'The Haj' by Leon Uris - Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. Me against my brother, me and my brother against our father. My family against my cousins and the clan. The clan against the tribe. The tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidels.

It is key to remember that in many countries such as France, Great Britain or the Netherlands the Muslim minority usually lives in enclaves where close to 100% of people are Muslim and where they can live with Sharia law. The police does not enter these enclaves anymore. There are no national courts, schools, no Non-Muslim institutions, in such enclaves Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Their children are indoctrinated in Quran schools any contact to an Infidel is a crime that will be punished. That's why in certain places Imams and extremist exercise more power than the actual Muslim population would suggest.

The current 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population but their birth rate is much higher than the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews and all other religions.

Before 2100 Muslims will make up more than 50% of the world population...