New NHS figures reveal areas where 9 in 10 babies are non-white

New statistics taken from NHS records of women who have just given birth show that white Britons now account for an average of just six in ten of those receiving maternity care. They also reveal the startling changes that a decade of record migration is having on different parts of the country.

In some inner city areas the proportion of white British mothers slumps to fewer than one in ten. But the impact on parts of Middle England is even more staggering.

NHS trusts which cover parts of the home counties - such as St Albans - report less than six in ten mothers are white British.

The figures will reignite the debate about the scale of immigration and the scale of social division, as well as the impact on public services. Ministers have pledged to force migrant workers to buy their own private health care to help reduce the burden on the NHS. Under the proposals non EU migrants would be entitled to emergency care but would have to buy insurance to cover the costs of GP visits and most operations.

The statistics raised fears the country is becoming increasingly divided along ethnic lines.

Of 652,638 deliveries in 150 NHS Trusts in England last year an average of 62 per cent of mothers were white British. But in some parts of rural England more than 95 per cent of mothers fell into that category. These included North Devon with 97.4 per cent, Co Durham and Darlington with 97.1, and Northumbria with 96 per cent.

But at the other end of the spectrum, North West London NHS Trust - which covers Harrow - just 9.4 per cent of mothers were white British.

Another inner city trust - Sandwell and West Birmingham - had just 16.5 per cent. Just over one in four mothers were white Britons at Guy's and St Thomas's hospital in central London.

But the West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, which covers St Albans, just 57 per cent of mothers giving birth were of white British origin.

Of the remaining 43 per cent, the biggest groupings were 'other white' - which includes Eastern Europeans - Indians, Pakistanis and Africans.

Backbench Tory MP Douglas Carswell said: 'I think we have to face reality and that is if you continue to have mass immigration it's going to have a very significant impact on the demography of our country - and it's going to have a significant impact perhaps on the sort of country that we are.'

Last month it emerged that Britain's population growth is outpacing every other country in Europe. Immigration and rising birth rates driven in part by the children of new arrivals - the so-called 'immigrant baby boom' - meant this country gained more people than anywhere else in the continent.

There were also warnings last week that Hungary is set to hand two million passports to people living outside the EU.

Ministers have pledge to put a limit on the number of immigrants from outside the EU given work permits for the UK. David Cameron has pledged to reduce the level of net migration - those arriving minus those leaving - from the hundreds to the tens of thousands.

DM

Reducing the level of immigration from outside the EU is going to make no difference whatsoever. When are these idiots going to wake up and realise that?

BNP parliamentary candidate assault inquiry dropped

There has been some good news for the British National patry's Robert Bailey...

An inquiry into an alleged assault by a British National Party parliamentary candidate has been dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Bob Bailey, the BNP's London organiser, was allegedly involved in a clash with some men in Harrow Road, Barking, on the eve of the general election.

The CPS said the men involved in the clash, which was filmed by the BBC, did not make any formal allegations.

Prosecutors found "there was no realistic prospect of conviction".

Mr Bailey and two other men, aged 18 and 19, were arrested over the incident in May.

A statement from CPS London said:

"When interviewed none of the parties involved in the incident captured on the BBC footage made any witness statements or formal allegations against each other. The only other evidence was the footage and after reviewing this we decided that there was no realistic prospect of conviction in line with the Code for Crown Prosecutors. We could not prove that Mr Bailey did not act in self-defence and the footage alone would not have been enough to do so. We therefore decided not to charge."

Blue John Cavern & Mines

The second in my list of places of interest to visit in derbyshire is the Blue John mines.

The Blue John mines in, Castleton, Hope Valley , is the only place in the world where Blue John stone can be found and there are 14 different veins of Blue John stone The name comes from the French for ‘Blue and Yellow’ which is ‘Bleu and Jaune’

Miners in the 1750's constructed a tunnel using only hand tools to reach the Blue John Stone deposits inside the hill. Veins of Blue John Stone across the cave roof, and 'The Pillar', are the largest piece ever found. Fossils in the limestone rock formed in the hillside 330 million years ago.

The mysterious Witch's Cave has even richer deposits of Blue John Stone are revealed. As you descend even deeper into the hill you will experience the wonder of underground limestone cave formations. Multi-coloured flowstone adorns the walls of Aladdin's Cave. Stalactites and stalagmites decorate Fairyland and the Dream Cave. The most famous formation is 'The Stork', standing on one leg!

During your tour the guide will explain where Blue John Stone came from, how rushing water made the caverns, and how stalactites are formed. Back on the outside, you can enjoy tea and coffee made from water collected inside the cavern, or browse in the shop where there is a selection of jewellery and ornaments made from Blue John Stone.

Treak Cliff Cavern is of international fame and geological importance. It has been a designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest for many years and by agreement with English Nature all the Blue John Stone deposits on the visitor route are preserved. However, Blue John Stone is regularly mined in Treak Cliff Cavern, from areas not seen by visitors. This is then crafted into fine jewellery, small bowls, ornaments and other decorative items.

Open 9:30am - 5pm in summer and 9:30am - dusk in winter
Prices: Adults £8, Children £4, Family £22, OAPs & Students £6
Tel: 01433 620642
More information can be found HERE

The Heights of Abraham - Matlock Bath

If you are stuck for something to do this summer I have put together a small list of places of interest for all ages. The first one on my list is the Heights of Abraham.

The Cable Car System - Since first opening its gates to visitors in 1780 the Heights of Abraham has remained one of the Peak District's most popular destinations. Originally the Heights of Abraham was reached on foot and required visitors to scale the steep slopes of Masson Hill. Since 1984 a visit begins with a journey on Britain"s first alpine style cable car system. Rising from the valley floor, the observation cars transport you in comfort and safety and allow stunning views of the Derwent Valley and surrounding Peak District.

The Hilltop Park and Views - Situated on the site of historic lead mining the Heights of Abraham originally opened as a Regency style 'Savage Garden'. Today the paths still follow many of the original routes around the 60 acres of Woodland hillside. Now, 200 years on, the planting scheme has matured, providing homes for a range of birds and wildlife.

The Show Caverns - It is said that the mining of this area began in Roman times, reaching its heyday in the 17th Century. The miners are now long gone but in emptying the ground of the rich mineral deposits, they left behind a large network of naturally formed caverns and passageways dating back millions of years. Now, regular guided tours allow you to retrace the footsteps of the Miners underground, and experience the spectacular caverns they left behind.

The Masson Cavern - Experience first hand our spectacular cavern system as it winds its way deep underground and into the hillside. With the help of a state of the art lighting installation your guide will take you on a fascinating journey. From the light of a single miners candle to the whole chamber being flooded with changing colours you will hear all about the caverns million year history.

The Rutland Cavern - Here, young and old alike can head underground to experience a day in the life of a 17th Century lead mining family. Once underground the miners tales are brought to life by a series of animatronics, recreating the atmosphere of life underground.

Who Why What - The perfect place to find the answers to all your questions about the history of the estate, and its attractions. Exhibitions as well as audio visual presentations are used to tell stories including the construction of the cable car system. Those daring enough can also have a go on one of our emergency rescue vehicles which thankfully we haven't had to use yet!

The Fossil Factory - An exciting new addition to the site which brings to life fun and interesting facts about rocks and fossils and the formation of the Peak District. In addition there is a film presentation about one of the Heights' own showcaves The Great Masson Cavern and perhaps most excitingly it is home to the fossilised remains of a giant Ichthyosaur, alive at the same time as the dinosaurs. At around 3 metres long it is one fossil you won't want to miss.

Heath & Heaven - A stunning exhibition of aerial photography. Shot by world-renowned photographer John Beatty on a single summers day the exhibition is a patchwork of fascinating aerial shots of the surronding Peak District accompanied with words and poems by Si Homfrey.

Play - Some may say that there is already plenty to see and do here at the Heights but should any children have any energy left they may wish to test their wits on the Explorers Challenge or take the plunge down our giant slide.

Open 10am – 5pm until 31^st October

Prices: Adult £11.50, Children and OAPs £8.50 Family of 4 £35, family of 5 £42

More information HERE

A conversation about race - what is racism.

The video link provided by Lex on the previous article was so good I decided to embed it here.

This video should be shown to everyone, in particular our children, so that when they are being brainwashed in schools they are already pre-armed with the truth.

And for those who say we all came from black people, this the video points out that a man and woman share more DNA than the different races.

Co-Op refuses to serve one of our returning soldiers for being in uniform

Is it any surprise that one of our soldiers returning from Afghanistan has been refused service in the New Addington, Croydon, Co-Op, when you consider the demographics? It is under 60% white. I'll let you guess what half the other 40% is made up of.

Here's the story...

A hero soldier who had just arrived home from a tour of Afghanistan was refused service at a supermarket after being told they didn't serve people in army uniform.

Sapper Anthony Walls, of the 21 Engineer Regiment, popped into the Co-op in Croydon for some beers after a gruelling 34-hour journey from Kandahar.

The 27-year-old, said it was his 'first hour back in the real world' after dodging Taliban bullets for the past four-and-a-half months helping build 'the most dangerous road in Afghanistan'.

But when he arrived at the till to pay he was met with a blank stare from the cashier, who refused to serve him and called for her manager.

When the manager turned up he told him he 'couldn't do anything about it' and refused to serve him while he was in uniform.

The patriotic soldier - who was on his way to his three-year-old nephew Jack's birthday party - simply left his beer at the check-out and walked out of the shop in daze.

He said: 'I was shocked and deeply hurt.

'All I was thinking about was getting home to Jack in time to wish him a happy birthday.

'It was great to be home after a difficult journey and I just thought I'd grab a couple of beers - a luxury I hadn't had in a while.

But when I came to pay the cashier refused to serve me and rang her bell.

'A male supervisor came along and the cashier explained she was refusing to serve me because I was in uniform.

'He looked at me and said "I can't do anything about it".

'I put the beer down and walked out.'

Anthony, who joined up when he was 17, said it was 'tough' in Afghanistan and that he had witnessed the death of one of his best pals, Sapper Daryn Roy, who died at the age of 28 in an IED explosion in May this year.

He added: 'It's really tough out there. Sometimes the only thing that keeps you going is the support and love from home. I appreciate the Co-op cashier may have had her own opinions about the war, but we are just doing a job and laying our lives down for this country. A little respect and appreciation would be nice.'

Anthony's sister Claire Lloyd, 33, said she was 'disgusted' at her brother's treatment at the Co-op store in New Addington, Croydon.

The mother-of-four said: 'I am so proud of Anthony - he works hard and willingly puts his own life on the line every day.

'To come home to this kind of treatment is disgusting.

'I feel he deserves an apology in person from the Co-op. Anthony and his colleagues are the unsung heroes of this country - they deserve the respect and civility extended to anyone else in a uniform.'

A spokesperson for The Co-operative said: 'This was a genuine mistake on the part of our two members of staff, and has nothing to do with anyone’s ethnicity, religion or personal views (pull the other one). We have apologised to the soldier in question and hope to welcome him back to the store.

'We do not have a policy that states that when wearing uniform, members of the armed forces should not be served alcohol or cigarettes and are all welcome in our stores.'

Violent thug jailed over animal cruelty

A violent teenage thug caught on CCTV brutally kicking and punching his pet puppy has been jailed for four months and banned from keeping animals for 10 years.

Simeon Major, 19, is seen in shocking footage repeatedly kicking the animal in the face and body in front of laughing friends during a sickening 20-minute assault.

He then slams the seven-month-old brown and white Staffordshire Bull Terrier on top of a 4ft high wall before punching it in the face so hard it falls off the other side.

The cowering animal can be seen trembling at his owners feet during the attacks, and tries to run away but is repeatedly chased back to the scene by Major.

He goaded the pet throughout to try and bite a friend during the sickening incident in Luton on March 29, but it refused.

The unemployed father-of-one, dressed in a tracksuit and beenie hat, posed confidently outside Luton Magistrates' Court before the 30 minute sentencing hearing.

But he sobbed in the dock as a four-minute edited version of his savage attack was played to the court on Wednesday.

Major, of Luton, pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering to an animal by unreasonably beating and kicking the dog at an earlier hearing.

District Judge Carolyn Mellanby handed Major an eight week jail term for attacking the dog and a further eight weeks for breach of a suspended sentence.

Passing sentence, Ms Mellanby said: 'This is the most appalling public display of violence it was quite horrific.

'You punched, struck and kicked a defenceless animal over a sustained period of time in front of other people.

'All be it showing off, it was shameful behaviour.'

Prosecutor Mark Jones said staff at Luton Borough Council saw the attack when they reviewed the CCTV footage three days later.

A vet examined the footage and ruled the animal had received unnecessary suffering although it has never been traced.

Mr Jones said: 'The defendant was interviewed and in fairness made full admissions. He told the RSPCA Inspector the dog was at that stage seven months old and he had the animal since it was a puppy.

'He admitted kicking the dog repeatedly over the 20 minute period. He was asked why and he said 'I just don't know what was going on'.

'He said 'I don't know what was going on in my brain. It was a mistake''.

Major was also banned from keeping, transporting, dealing or owning animals for 10 years and must wait five years until he can apply for the order to be lifted.

Any animal in his possession will also be seized by the Rspca, the court ordered.

Kajel Doshi, mitigating, told the court Major, who was abandoned by his father as a child, had been in foster care for most of his young life and moved to Luton to escape gangs in London.

His life went off the rails when his girlfriend unexpectedly gave birth to his son earlier this year and he was a keen musician who had been touted as 'the next Bob Marley'.

She said: 'Mr Major simply cannot explain his actions. he is unable to watch the footage and cried during the interview and couldn't control himself.

'He simply doesn't know who that person in the footage is.

'The prospect of becoming a father turned him into self-destruct mode. He's gone crazy.

'The attack was awful, it's horrible and disgusting and Mr Major accepts that.'

Following sentencing RSPCA Inspector Pete Warne said: 'There is no excuse for this sort of attack and I hope Mr Major understands that now he is behind bars.

'We are satisfied with the result as someone like this should not be allowed to keep animals.

'It is not right that someone should be able to treat an animal like that and I hope the sentence serves as a message to others.'

The pet Staffordshire Bull Terrier has not been confiscated from Major and the RSPCA are investigating its whereabouts.

Major received a eight week suspended sentence on June 1 for possession of cannabis, possession of a bladed article and two counts of failing to surrender to custody.

Daily Mail

Drugs, knives, gangs, animal cruelty... this scumbag should be put down.

Jim Dowson breaks his silence

As you all know, there is a leadership challenge within the British National Party. I haven't touched on this story as yet. One thing I do know is that some members of the party are divided when it comes down to Jim Dowson.

Mr Dowson has taken the bull by the horns and increased the BNP's turneover from £165,000 in 2007 to over £2million in 2010.

It appears to me there is jealousy in the ranks and of course they are trying to smear Mr Dowson.

So far, Mr Dowson has ignored. Until now...

Jim Dowson has broken his silence on Michaela Mckenzie in a legal statement which forms part of a group legal action which has been launched against her.


LEGAL STATEMENT BY JIM DOWSON :

I carry on business as Midas Consultancy from Belfast and other offices throughout Europe.

1. I had dealings with Michaela Mackenzie on behalf of the British National Party. She was employed by the Party as an administrative assistant.

2. My involvement with the Party commenced in November 2007, when I was engaged as an overall business consultant to administer and deal with their business systems. I have 25 years of business experience and formed my business consultancy in 1999. The business operates from Belfast, from where the Party administration was directed by me. In addition to the general consultancy, I was engaged by the Party as their general manager from March 2008 until June 2009.

3. I understand that Michaela Mackenzie was engaged to work for the Party in January 2008 and that she initially worked from her home in Bristol.

4. At the time that I first became involved with the Party I arranged for certain members to attend managerial courses. The first of these was in February 2008 under the title of ‘Top Managers Make Things Happen’. This was a 3-day course incorporating several modules (including ‘time management’, ‘how to avoid arguments’ and several others). This course was held for Party members and employees in Valencia, Spain. The 3-day course was quite intensive, but all the expenses involved in attendance were paid for by the Party. This included Mrs Mackenzie’s expenses.

5. One of the systems which I initiated was the use of a staff work sheet. All employees of the Party were required to complete such a sheet as an act of discipline. Mrs Mackenzie was required to complete such a form also and some of these are included within the bundle of documents at pages.

6. Part of her duties insofar as I was concerned was to collate these worksheets from the various employees and report to me thereon. In addition, she had also been appointed (for a time) as the National Nominating Officer for the Party. This concerned the appointment of candidates on behalf of the Party and much of the function related to delegating the organisation of candidates to local officers.

7. As part of my organisation, we arranged for there to be staff meetings every few months; these were held at various locations. They were regarded as an opportunity for parties to ventilate any problems which they might have. As an aid to this, we issued ‘self-assessment forms’, which were designed for anyone who might be struggling with a particular matter.

8. I have to say, in my experience, there were a number of occasions when Mrs Mackenzie was upset about abusive comments from some of the staff. She was often in tears about this. However, my initial view was that, in view of the business experience which she purported to have, and as she had had adequate training with us, it ought to have been possible to overcome any such difficulties.

9. I was engaged by the Party under a consultancy agreement and details of this are in the contract at page 1 of the bundle. I was to receive 7.5% commission of the direct mail fundraising initiatives that I instituted on behalf of the Party. This figure was capped at £75,000 (£1,000,000 of party income) There was no arrangement for me to be paid extra commission or income because of the number of enquiries received from the public. Requests for information packs, etc were part and parcel of the dissemination of information, which was part of our management function and was already a longstanding party function.

10. As a part of the Party’s expansion, and with a view to participating in the European Elections in 2009, I arranged for the opening of a number of offices about the country. One of these was at Stroud which was opened in about February 2009. It was intended that Mrs Mackenzie would run this office. She had given the impression that she had extensive experience in business management and that she would be well able to cope with the administration involved.

11. There were frequent meetings between administrative staff and me including Mrs Mackenzie. I visited the Stroud office on about four occasions during 2009. On one occasion, in about April that year, I saw that there was a huge pile of letters which had not been sent out. The office had two employees, Lee and Donna Hancock, who worked under Mrs Mackenzie. Donna worked on a full-time basis but Lee was employed on a part-time basis. When I asked Donna about the letters she told me that there was no postage available to send them out (this meant that there was no credit facility on the office franking machine). I discovered that there was credit, but the reason for the problem was the single fact that there was no ink in the machine. Donna told me that she did not know how to deal with this, despite the fact that there was a printed notice on top of the machine giving instructions as to how to obtain and install ink, etc.

12. The result of this was that many letters, which should have gone out to interested parties (either as information packs, or for the promotion of the European Elections, or to members with new membership cards) had not been sent. Also the Hancocks were not able to ‘merge’ text onto party letterheads and were printing ‘finished’ letters in black and white, sent by the membership secretary. Therefore, there were many boxes of letterheads which required processing and producing as finished items. In fact, the cumbersome way in which the office staff was dealing with these meant that it was taking about eight minutes to print, produce and envelope each individual missive. These missives usually contained a letter, brochure, possibly a newspaper, a membership card and badge for those joining, all of which should have been put in an envelope together.

13. This was grossly inefficient and caused me great concern. I asked Mrs Mackenzie about these problems and she said something to the effect that she was deeply unhappy with the ‘stupid, lazy and dirty’ behaviour of Mr and Mrs Hancock. (By dirty, explained – leaving dirty cups about, and their unkempt personal appearance etc.) She stated that they were regularly late for work and often had a hangover when they did arrive.

14. The particular problems with the franking machine required some organisation to resolve, but this would have taken a day or two to complete. I therefore went out, immediately, and purchased £400 worth of stamps on my debit card so that the arrears of mailing could be dealt with at once.

15. On another occasion, the party chairman and I visited Stroud to try to motivate and inspire the Hancocks by offering help and training; we took them for a meal. We arranged that they would receive IT training the following day at Stroud to help them overcome their woeful knowledge of the most basic systems, i.e.: ‘word’, ‘excel’, etc. Unfortunately, they turned up late the next day at 10.23 (entry in my diary) and quite obviously much the worse for wear. Mrs Mackenzie made an excuse for Mr and Mrs Hancock, telling me that the reason they were late for work was that their car had broken down. However, she subsequently admitted (by 12 noon) to me that this was not the case and that she had told me this in order to make an excuse for them. It was after this that I sent two other Party members, to help clear the arrears and move things along efficiently. They came from Birmingham and spent a couple of days each week for about six weeks at about the end of April/early May.

16. I made about four visits to the Stroud office during about April/May 2009, when the European Elections were at their height.. There was another occasion when she was reprimanded for smoking in the office only a few weeks later by Simon Darby. I sent a letter to her warning her of this and the fact that it was illegal and a matter of gross misconduct.

17. One of my early visits to Stroud in or around the beginning of April related to the Stroud office being tasked with sending information regarding the European Elections. Mrs Mackenzie had given me the impression that she knew how to deal with pre-paid printed mail envelopes. This entailed bulk posting of documents to members/subscribers, etc. The bulk letters, when ready, then required a docket for each bundle of mail. It seemed, however, that Mrs Mackenzie was not familiar with this procedure and so I explained it to her again. I then learned that about six sacks of mail (equivalent to about 900 envelopes) had been prepared, but that no dockets had been submitted with them. The purpose of the docket is so that the Post Office can check the bundle of mail, verify same and charge it to our account. If there was no docket then the mail would probably become in effect ‘lost’. Apart from the fact that no docket had been prepared for this mail, I was informed, by Lee Hancock, that the sacks had not even been delivered properly to the Post Office but had been left outside the Post Office compound fence. I regarded this as being not only incompetent but also a serious security risk. There is no reason why our members or people interested in the activities of the Party should suffer the risk of having their names and addresses exposed by discovery through sacks of mail which – in all probability – might be undelivered, considered to be abandoned, and then thrown anywhere.

18. I took this up with Mrs Mackenzie but she did not seem to understand the seriousness of the problem. In effect, she refused to accept any responsibility for the errors which had occurred. I became quite exasperated by this and, eventually, I understand that Mark Collett (in charge of Party publicity) instructed Mrs Mackenzie on how to manage the docket requirement by dealing with it on-line. Altogether, there were about 30,000 letters which had to be dealt with in this way. It seemed from my experience that Mrs Mackenzie had not been aware of how to deal with these procedures. At this time other volunteers were in situ at the office, as I had lost all faith in the competence of Mrs. Mackenzie.

19. A further problem in the Stroud office was a new and expensive telephone `system (Siemens). The facility to use a loudspeaker (hands free) and to transfer calls between ‘phone receivers within the office was apparently beyond Mrs Mackenzie and Mr and Mrs Hancock, despite being shown how to operate it by the installation company. When Nick Griffin, the Chairman, came to visit the office this was obvious and was quite embarrassing. As a result of this I did call out Siemens to come and re-instruct the staff on how to use the facilities provided; altogether I think they came out about three times. Similar problems were recurring with the alarm system; the staff just could not understand how to use it. Again, I had to request the installers to return on several occasions to give appropriate instructions.

20. In addition to the above, a list of names and addresses were sent to Stroud on a PDF format (as nobody in Stroud, despite intensive training could master an excel spreadsheet merger format). There had been about 12,000 processed ‘phone calls requesting information about the Party (approximately 13,000 were still in the system). It only required the Stroud office to reproduce the necessary information re name and address; they could then incorporate this into a certain format, and would be able to reproduce letters/labels for appropriate information to be sent out to interested parties. It seems that understanding this system was beyond the capabilities of the staff at Stroud. This is why the Lumbys were put in place as well as other volunteers.

21. A further problem related to donations which were processed in the Stroud office. These donations were sent to Donna Hancock in batches, for her to make the necessary entries and thence obtain authorisation for payment of the contributions. I received calls from donors that some of the donations had not been taken from the donor’s bank account (one donation alone amounted to £2500.00). When I telephoned Donna about this she told me that the instructions had not made sense to her and so she had left it. It might have been that the reason could have been due to an incompatibility of the instructing technology with the recipient technology. I did ask her why she had not reported the problem to me so that something could be done about it. Instructions were given as to how to deal with these matters. Again, the failure to manage this office system effectively was, I felt, due to failings by Mrs. Mackenzie. I did try to instruct Lee Hancock on installing an upgrade to his computer over the phone but was told in a most aggressive manner to “fuck off! You don’t tell me a ******* thing Jim you’re not the boss.

22. Notwithstanding having tried to resolve the donation processing, the problem occurred again and I received calls that donations had not been taken. Once again I contacted Donna and she told me she did not know how to enter the appropriate number. This meant that authorised contributions may well have gone missing. I asked Mrs Mackenzie about this and told her that she should keep her eye on what was being done. She was, after all, the manageress of the Stroud operation and, if something was wrong, then it was for her to sort it out.

23. It was also discovered that Mrs Mackenzie had been smoking in the office. This had become a criminal offence and we sent a letter to her warning her about this breach of discipline. (Stupid law in my opinion)

24. Reference has been made to a list of names and addresses which were sent to Mrs Mackenzie re another organisation. In fact, this was but was from another (redundant) list which I had. I have a personal interest in religious and pro-life activities; such lists are connected with that involvement – they do not form part of my activities on behalf of the Party, which is totally separate. It is quite clear that this list had been sent by mistake.

25. Within the context of the information which I had, this list was forwarded by mistake to Stroud. Mrs Mackenzie thought that the named parties were perhaps inappropriate for the purpose of sending out Party information. She was quite right about this, as it had nothing at all to do with the BNP, and would have proved unhelpful to all concerned, especially me.

26. When I became acquainted with this I notified her that the list had been sent by mistake and was to be ignored. This mistake was quickly discovered within hours by my people and by the Lumbys as the names were mainly religious clerics/organisations. Mrs Mackenzie was immediately informed but seemed keen to continue with them until it became apparent that all parties were well aware of this mistake.

27. The forwarding of the list was a mistake and fortunately it was not acted upon. There would have been no great problem about the people on the list receiving political information, but as they were mainly religious persons/religious houses, it would probably have been inappropriate. When I became aware of the situation, I gave instructions to Mrs Mackenzie that the list should and must be ignored.

28. Mrs Mackenzie seeks to make out that the list was sent in order to enhance a ‘commission programme’ which I had with the Party. This is not so for the reasons which are set out in paragraph 9 above.

29. I should say that quite simply because of my involvement with various organisations that my business would have had possession of such lists.

30. Around this time I was beginning to question the mental state of Mrs Mackenzie. During one of my last visits she informed me that the building was haunted and she had “seen things” but she was not worried about the three ghosts! As they were friendly and she had spoken to them! She also informed me on that day that Donna was a full blown practising witch! This shocked me and I immediately informed the Chairman, who also found this rather shocking and told me to keep an eye on the situation.

31. I became increasingly frustrated at the lack of competence at the Stroud office. Whilst I could understand that Mr and Mrs Hancock might not have been particularly competent, I thought that Mrs Mackenzie should have been able to give them proper instructions. I understood that she had previously held responsible administrative positions in a managerial capacity, but such ability was not apparent from my dealings with her. Eventually, I issued my memorandum of 16th May 2009 which goes into considerable detail about the problems which were emanating from the Stroud office.

32. Mrs Mackenzie was requested to travel to Belfast to try to sort out what was going on in Stroud and to see how we could help her resolve the difficulties. She met with me and party accountant John Thompson. Her attitude was surly and combative and said directly to me “You will give it to me in the neck once boy, then you’ll see”. We discussed the Hancocks and Mrs Mackenzie said they were totally useless and had to go. I offered to go to Stroud and gently work out a way to let them go without offending them too much or humiliating them; we appreciated they might have been and perhaps were well-intentioned, but were not really competent for the job.

33. Mrs Mackenzie immediately stated that it was her job to dismiss and she was quite capable of acting and, indeed, would dismiss them in a week or so. As she was adamant I advised her to be as generous as possible re leaving pay and suggested 3 months money each just to lessen the blow. I took her decisiveness as an attempt at last to face up to her responsibilities; sadly, this was not the case.

34. I asked Mrs Mackenzie to dismiss Mr and Mrs Hancock because of their apparent lack of competence in dealing with the matters which were required. I also had in mind that she had severely criticised their ability and stated that they were not sufficiently competent. Whilst I had nothing against Mr and Mrs Hancock personally, they did seem to have difficulties in carrying out the functions for which they were engaged. Whether this was because of their own failings, or due to lack of proper supervision by Mrs Mackenzie, I am not sure.

35. In any event, after I had instructed her to dismiss Hancock, Mrs Mackenzie then sought ‘advice’ from Lee Barnes, who is the internal legal officer for the Party. Mr Barnes gave an account of what was required in dismissal cases, which Mrs Mackenzie took up with me.

36. With all due respect, this was almost totally irrelevant to the situation which had arisen. At that time (up until June 2009) I was in charge of business administration in the Party, including the supervision of the Stroud office. My memorandum of May 2009 made the position clear. Apart from the seeming lack of competence of Mrs Mackenzie, the involvement of Mr and Mrs Hancock was not helping to get things done efficiently; I had had to involve Mr and Mrs Lumby for a time in order to extricate the office from its difficulties.

37. For good intentions, I had instructed Mrs Mackenzie to give Mr and Mrs Hancock appropriate notice. She then went on a venture of her own, involving the internal legal officer, and trying to tell me how the Party should deal with matters so far as Mr and Mrs Hancock were concerned.

38. I felt that these representations, even if well-intentioned, were entirely irrelevant. I was trying to produce an effective administration at Stroud and, on behalf of the Party, I considered that two of the members were not sufficiently competent. Mrs Mackenzie should accordingly have followed my instructions or, alternatively, she should have referred the matter to the Party Chairman, Mr Griffin for determination.

39. It was not her business to involve the internal legal officer and to begin an argument with me as to whether the Party was or was not liable to Mr and Mrs Hancock concerning their employment. This was completely extraneous and was either misguided or else badly intentioned. The result was, in any event, that Mr and Mrs Hancock were released from their duties.

40. In addition to all these problems, I had received a number of reports that Mrs Mackenzie had been spreading outlandish stories about senior party officials and that she was going to take the party ‘to the cleaners’. Also that I was the most evil man she had ever met. This I found deeply troubling and thought that she had taken leave of her senses. I was therefore concerned about the sensitive data in Stroud and what could happen to it given the apparent strange behaviour of Mrs Mackenzie.

41. Over the next few days I tried to speak to Mrs Mackenzie but she would not take my calls. It became clear that she was determined not to come back and indeed had no intention of reconciling with the party. As a result, it was decided that the Stroud office would have to be closed, in order to protect – so far as we were able – party records etc. This was done and I reported the position to Mr Griffin, who sent the letter of 15th June 2009 to Mrs Mackenzie.

42. There were a lot of files, including personal files, kept at Stroud. We subsequently found that many of these were missing from the office. We do not know what has happened to them.

43. It was a very sad end for someone with whom I got on tremendously well at first. However, there seemed to be no alternative and, it appeared, Mrs Mackenzie wanted it so.

More to follow...

While the average pensioner has paid into the system for between 40 and 60 years and contributed to the growth of Great Britain, and immigrants have done absolutely zilch, I thought you may be interested to see how our government repays them.

It just goes to show how little thought of they are.

Pensioners are the backbone of our country. They have fought and died for us, built this country up to what it is, only for the government to discard them and fill up our beautiful land with invaders.

Thanks to my friend odin for the info.

Immigration and Terrorism in Great Britain

It’s surprising how much you miss when you are away. I’ve only been away for 10 days and on returning I checked the papers to see what’s been happening.

Oh boy!

We have reports of the UK’s immigration growth being out of control, overtaking the rest of Europe, and predictions of migrants driving our population up to nearly 80 million within 40 years time.

Four out of ten houses built to cope with the rise in population already house migrants and it is estimated that over the next 25 years, 25 MILLION extra homes will have to be built.

There are the Eastern Europeans; the Polish, Lithuanians, Romanians and travellers, bringing with them even more crime, drug, prostitution and child trafficking.

While travellers are allowed to illegally camp, one man, who lives next to one such campsite, has had planning permission denied for 13 years and is on the road to losing his livelihood. And yet a legal camp that cost the taxpayer half a million pounds has virtually been unused for ten years.

Then we have Pakistani terrorists sending parcel bombs to No10 and MI6, while other suspects are queuing up for compensation for breaches in their human rights.

WHERE ARE THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE THESE SCUM KILL AND MAIM!

And then of course there are ‘vicars’ carrying out scam marriages so illegal immigrants can stay here, and not forgetting ‘virginity repair’, some at the tax payer’s expense, for muslim women who don’t want their future husband’s and relatives to know she’s not a virgin.

No, that would never do, would it? I mean, if there is no blood on the sheets on her wedding night she’s in big trouble, isn’t she? She’d probably be found dead somewhere, unless she’s gone ‘missing’, with her throat cut and acid thrown in her face. There’s no stonings here, not just yet anyway, but it’s only a matter of time.

But mark my words, it WILL come. There are already no-go areas for white British people in our own country and thanks to Cameron, it looks like Turkey will be joining the EU. That’s 70 million more muslims able to flood Britain.

We have an aging population you see, but not Turkey, they have a very young population and guess where they are going to head to, to spread their vile ideology and clog up our welfare and national health system.

You’ve got it. They’ll come here, because Britain is a soft touch. Not only that, they know if islam conquer Britain it can conquer anywhere.

I would like to know, I would REALLY like to know, why the people of Britain vote for the likes of Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour. They are intent on destroying Britain and her people.

And while they sit in Westminster it is US that bear the burden...