Asians attack EDL in Tower Hamlets

Oldham council and the big social experiment - Recipe for disaster

In the ultimate political correct agenda, a local council is to force different communities together in a big social experiment... already failed in other parts of the UK.

Recorded from Newsnight, 05 August 2010.

BNP parliamentary candidate assault inquiry dropped

There has been some good news for the British National patry's Robert Bailey...

An inquiry into an alleged assault by a British National Party parliamentary candidate has been dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Bob Bailey, the BNP's London organiser, was allegedly involved in a clash with some men in Harrow Road, Barking, on the eve of the general election.

The CPS said the men involved in the clash, which was filmed by the BBC, did not make any formal allegations.

Prosecutors found "there was no realistic prospect of conviction".

Mr Bailey and two other men, aged 18 and 19, were arrested over the incident in May.

A statement from CPS London said:

"When interviewed none of the parties involved in the incident captured on the BBC footage made any witness statements or formal allegations against each other. The only other evidence was the footage and after reviewing this we decided that there was no realistic prospect of conviction in line with the Code for Crown Prosecutors. We could not prove that Mr Bailey did not act in self-defence and the footage alone would not have been enough to do so. We therefore decided not to charge."

Shopping centre bosses approve 'Asian squat toilets'

Yet more pandering to foreigners...

Middle Eastern-style 'squat' toilets are to be fitted in a shopping centre after bosses attended a cultural awareness course.

WCs at Rochdale's Exchange shopping centre will include two Nile pans alongside traditional western toilets when they reopen following a refurbishment.

The pans differ from western toilets as the user is able to squat over them, rather than sitting. They are preferred by some members of the Asian community for cultural reasons and were installed to give staff and customers the option of using them.

The decision to install pans in the ladies and gents toilets came about after centre management attended a cultural training course with community activist Ghulam Rasul Shahzad. The retired Rochdale Council training officer runs courses for the police and other organisations about cultural understanding and community cohesion.

Mr Shahzad took the centre manager Lorenzo O'Reilly and his team on a tour around Central Mosque, including a look at its toilets, as part of the course.

He said: 'The management at the centre were very committed to improving the service they offered to the community and were very responsive. We always work together to understand each other from both sides and find a balance. That is the beauty of Rochdale. That is why I am proud to be a Rochdalian.'

A spokeswoman for the centre said: 'We regularly receive cultural awareness training from Ghulam and when we were planning the toilets this was something that cropped up.'

The toilets will open next Monday.

Nile Pan toilets can be bought from a limited number of UK plumbing retailers, priced about £200.

Rochdale hit the headlines during this year's General Election campaign when pensioner Gillian Duffy was dismissed by Gordon Brown as a 'bigoted woman' when she voiced concern about immigration.

Government research last year showed more than a quarter of primary school pupils in Rochdale spoke English as a foreign language - and named one school, Heybrook Primary, where every single one of the 453 pupils spoke English as a second language.

The town's council recently produced a special 'Black and Minority Ethnic' housing strategy for the town 'in recognition of the increasing ethnic diversity in Rochdale' and the minorities' 'level of housing need'.

In the aftermath of the 2001 Oldham race riots, Rochdale was placed on an 'at risk' list by the Home Office whichwas monitoring possible spread of such violence.

Source

The £18,000 council job you can't apply for if you are white

A council has been accused of discrimination after white people were barred from applying for two £18,000-a-year jobs.

Bristol City has created the management training posts for graduates in an effort to recruit more minority employees.

As a result the council will only accept applications from ethnic minorities for the two-year placements.

But this has prompted criticism from white graduates struggling to find work.

One jobseeker, who did not wish to be named, described the posts as 'totally racist'.

He said: 'I am a tolerant white person who has lived in Bristol for 27 years.

'I am searching for a job and stumbled across a job advertisement on Bristol City Council's website that I see as totally racist.

'I feel the job would be an excellent opportunity for me to make use of the skills and qualifications that I have acquired but, being white, I am excluded.

'Equal opportunities means giving everyone an equal chance to succeed rather than discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin.'

The two jobs are described on BCC's website as 'open to black and minority ethnic graduates' only, with applications closing on June 11.

Full story HERE

Teenage gang force three boys to lick their boots in humiliating train ride

Do you know any of these scumbags?

This is the type of racist scum trying to rule our streets these days...

Taken from the Birmingham Mail

RAILWAY police are hunting a gang of thugs who told three teenagers: “Lick our boots” during a 30-minute terror journey into Birmingham.

Officers said the boys – two 16-year-olds and another aged 17 – were also threatened with violence and suffered a “humiliating and degrading” ordeal at the hands of the gang.

British Transport Police today released CCTV images of eight people, including a girl, they want to trace in connection with the incident.

It happened when the louts boarded the New Street-bound train at Blake Street Station, near Sutton Coldfield.

Det Con Tim Friend, from British Transport Police, described the ordeal as “degrading bullying” and appealed for help to find the culprits.

“A group of between eight and ten Asian males and females bullied the lads for the whole of the 30-minute journey,” he said.

“They were told ‘kiss our feet’ and anyone who said no was threatened with violence. It was pretty unpleasant.”

A British Transport Police spokesman said: “We are seeking to identify the individuals pictured who we would like to speak to in connection with a robbery on a train service between Blake Street and New Street stations.

“Three young males were subjected to a protracted ordeal of bullying before having property stolen under threat of further violence.”

The victims were heading into the city for a concert on board a train that left Lichfield City station at 5.50pm on November 9 last year.

Police said the ordeal lasted until the train arrived at New Street.

The frightened lads were eventually robbed of their mobile phones, cash, train tickets and one had a concert ticket stolen.

Their assailants were seen giggling and joking with each other as they left the train.

The victims raised the alarm shortly after the train arrived in Birmingham, telling police the torment left them feeling “humiliated and degraded”.

Police checked CCTV footage from the station and Pallasades shopping centre to catch the culprits.

Detectives are now appealing to Birmingham Mail readers to help identify a group of people they want to speak to in connection with the incident after their own investigations drew a blank.

* Anyone who recognises those in the images or who has any information about the incident should contact Det Con Tim Friend on 0121 654 2244 or 0800 405040.

Lib Dem Resigns Over Racist Email

Picture from the stokenorthlibdems website

And they call the BNP racist...

Lib Dem parliamentary candidate David Jack resigns after an offensive email was sent from his official email address.

The Liberal Democrats have launched an investigation into the incident after learning about it earlier today.

A spokesperson said: "We were first alerted to this email exchange earlier today. David Jack is no longer a parliamentary candidate for the Liberal Democrats and we have launched an immediate investigation."

Channel 4 News Political Correspondent Cathy Newman has spoken to Mr Jack, who denies sending the email, which contains sexually offensive and racist language - although he admits it did come from his official email account.

Mr Jack said he had been drinking in Stoke last Friday night when the email was sent at 10.24pm but he was nowhere near his home computer in Cheshire.

The email contains the following sentences (we have removed any reference to the recipient to protect their identity, but Channel 4 News can confirm it was sent to someone with a name of Asian extraction).

Warning: you may find the language used extremely offensive.

"...if I was you I would f*** back off to the hills of tora borro (sic), I have your home address, you are f***** sunshine, we shall see who has got balls now you two faced lying f****** paki... your cards f*****... prison awaits you b** boy. Think your (sic) brave, you don't know the line you have crossed you f*** witt (sic) - keep looking over you shoulder theif! (sic)"

Story from the Channel4 website

Stopping smoking and the NHS

I am thinking of stopping smoking and thought I'd take a look online to see what help was available. I've tried quite a few times and always started again.

During my search I came across NHS Choices Smoke Free which had different sections such as the addiction test.

I chose to look at the timeline section which explains the benefits of stopping smoking and how quickly your body adjusts once you stop. In this section you can download videos and guides.

It was while I was checking out the downloads that I came across a section called 'South Asian tobacco use information'. I wondered what the hell South Asia had to do with the NHS so I opened the file.

And there it was, in Urdu, Punjabi, Hindi, Gujarati and Bengali. Not just a leaflet available in various languages (24 to be precise), but a whole section for Asians in our country.

Now then, if they have to have their own section doesn't that tell you something?

And considering London is now so diverse, is it a surprise that the ultra diverse Queen Mary University of London - incidently spread around the lovely Tower Hamlets - is one of the organisations involved in the campaign?

It looks like the big takeover is well under way.

Home Office covered up immigration risk

Labour's “open door” immigration policy knowingly risked allowing dangerous people to settle in Britain unchecked, according to documents seen by The Sunday Times.

The Whitehall correspondence, which was illegally withheld by the Home Office for four years, shows how ministers were told by the country’s most senior immigration official that his staff were to be “encouraged to take risks” when granting visas, work permits and extended residency to hundreds of thousands of new migrants.

The cover-up of this policy of risk-taking was so concerted that Richard Thomas, the then information commissioner, sent a team of investigators into the Home Office to trawl all the relevant papers. Earlier this year he rebuked the department for breaking the law and ordered it to release the material under the freedom of information (FoI) law.

The documents help to explain the huge rise in the flow of migrants into Britain as the Home Office rushed to clear a backlog of 45,000 cases.

Officials agreed to fast-track 337,000 applications with minimal checks. This led to a rapid rise in immigration. In 1999, 170,000 visas were granted; by 2002, this had risen to 300,000.

As officials were being ordered to take risks, several potentially dangerous people entered the UK. In late 2001, more than 20 Taliban, who had fled from Afghanistan after their defeat by American and British forces, were allowed to stay in the UK.

The documents cast new light on the row over past immigration policy, highlighted by the recent rise of the British National party.

Last week Alan Johnson became the first Labour home secretary to admit the government had made mistakes in its handling of immigration. He said ministers had ignored problems about failed asylum seekers and foreign national prisoners. They had also failed to grasp public unease about the growing pressure on jobs and public services.

Johnson’s remarks signalled the government’s belated recognition that its immigration policy has alienated its white working-class vote, tempting a significant minority to back the BNP. The documents indicate that, far from being a mistake, there was a deliberate policy — apparently endorsed at the highest level in the Home Office — to promote concerted risk-taking by immigration staff whose job was to decide whether non-European Union migrants applying to work, study or marry in Britain were genuine.

A key figure in the scandal was Sir Bill Jeffrey, who was the director-general of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Britain’s most senior immigration official. He is now at the centre of controversy as the senior civil servant in charge of the Ministry of Defence.

The other key figure was Beverley Hughes, then minister of state for citizenship and immigration. She was later forced to resign after it emerged she had misled MPs about whether she had been warned that Romanian and Bulgarian crime gangs might want to exploit the UK’s decision to open its borders to those seeking work from eastern Europe.

In March 2003, shortly after the 2001 entry permits to the Taliban had come to light — to an outcry in the press — Jeffrey spelled out the policy in a note to Hughes.

“We are still in a situation where some risks have to be taken, and staff should feel that if they are encouraged to take risks they will be supported when something does go wrong,” he wrote.

The minister’s office replied by e-mail three days later:

“Beverley Hughes has seen and noted your submission of 7 March . . . Beverley feels the basic point is that while staff have to take some risks, this was a decision that flew in the face of common sense.”

The e-mail was copied to David Blunkett, then home secretary, and Sir John Gieve, his most senior mandarin. The words “to be withheld” were later scribbled across the top, an apparent instruction not to comply with an FoI request for its release.

The same words appear on a note, prepared by Jeffrey, sent to Hughes a few day later. In it, in response to Hughes’s insistent complaints about the need to clear the 45,000 backlog, he outlined the new “risk-taking” policy. This involved fast-tracking all 337,000 applications, with little or no regard as to whether they were merited.

The policy, codenamed Brace, meant that officials had to make quick decisions based on the paperwork in an applicant’s file, regardless of whether it was complete. No further follow-up checks were to be made.

Jeffrey said staff were given guidance that “Brace is about pragmatic (ie not pursing every angle that could conceivably justify refusal) grants rather than pragmatic refusals”.

In other words, the official policy was in principle to grant applications rather than to refuse them.

This telling exchange — and equally significant evidence of a concerted cover-up — is buried deep in a batch of documents that ministers tried desperately to prevent being made public.

Their illegal activity followed an application by a Whitehall whistleblower, Steve Moxon, to force them to release the material under the Freedom of Information Act.

An immigration case worker whose ultimate bosses had been Jeffrey and Hughes, Moxon was sacked after telling The Sunday Times about the fast-tracking process in 2004. He has spent five years trying to obtain the truth about the policy, which Hughes always claimed publicly was implemented by junior officials without her knowledge.

Not only do the papers expose her claim as untrue; they go further in showing that Hughes and Jeffrey were happy to encourage the culture of deliberate risk-taking.

When an FoI application was made to see their exchanges, ministers argued that the material was exempt from disclosure because policy advice given by officials to their political masters should remain confidential.

In official correspondence with the information commissioner, the Home Office said that “a Home Office minister” had ruled that the documents should not be released.

But in March this year, Thomas ruled: “The public interest in favour of maintaining the exemption does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure.

“The commissioner requires the (Home Office) to disclose the information which has been withheld . . . In failing to release information, the commissioner finds that the (Home Office) breached sections 1 and 10 (of the Freedom of Information Act.”

The government reluctantly conceded, placing the documents on an obscure part of the department’s website, apparently in the hope that nobody would notice.

Yesterday, the Tories said they would be demanding an urgent explanation of the documents from the government.

Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, said: “This is shaping up to become one of the major political scandals of recent times. Ministers quite clearly broke the law and deliberately misled the public to cover up a policy which most reasonable people would say was utterly irresponsible.”

Whiff of a smoking gun

Why did new Labour secretly open Britain’s borders, while pretending to control the numbers under its so-called “managed migration” policy?

Two weeks ago Andrew Neather, a former speechwriter for Tony Blair, wrote an article saying Labour had allowed immigration to rocket in order to turn Britain “truly multicultural” and “to rub the right’s noses in diversity”.

The heart of his claim was that uncontrolled mass immigration had been a deliberate, covert policy to change the country’s demographics.

But Labour’s core vote, the white working class, were drawn to the BNP at the resulting pressure on jobs, homes and schools.

Alan Johnson, the home secretary, has said Labour was “maladroit” on the issue: the immigration door was left wide open because of “cock-up” not a “conspiracy”. But Neather’s account may be only half the story.

Chris Mullin, a former minister, recalled in his memoirs that ministers had “barely touched the rackets that surrounded arranged marriages . . . terrified of the huge cry of ‘racism’ that would go up

. . . There is the added difficulty that at least 20 Labour seats, including Jack (Straw’s), depend on Asian votes”.

With up to 80% of ethnic minorities voting Labour, it is obvious that the more immigrants who get the right to vote, the greater is Labour’s electoral share. Perhaps Mullin has stumbled on a smoking gun.

TimesOnline

Vile comments from vile 'people'

Oh dear. The truth really hurts some people.

Newspapers are finally starting to filter through stories about how multiculturalism is really affecting the British people and some of you out there don't like it.

Resorting to vile comments is not the correct way to handle any situation, but if that is the way you choose to go then please remember to withhold your email address.

This morning I received a lovely message from someone called zed on the 'Asian clerks snubs British mum' story, on which he said "fuk u lyin hoe". It's quite mild actually, considering some I receive.

I hate to be the one to tell him this but the story was taken from a newspaper, as are nearly all my articles.

So, I thought some of you out there may like to tell zed what a silly, nasty little boy he is. Here is his email address...

zedz65@hotmail.com

Note to zed... Learn English. Classes are free.

Racial attacks on whites don't count

Dewsbury Ethnic Cleansing Update:

Police refuse to classify vicious assault on British teenager as racially motivated, while attacks escalate.

DaisyManone

A LONE teenage boy was knocked unconscious, stabbed in the hand and had his teeth knocked loose by a gang who stole his bicycle.

His traumatised mum said her son was out with friends at Rectory Park in Thornhill, just hours after the family returned from holiday on Friday.

He was expected home at 9pm, but at 8.50pm the gang of about 10 to 15, who had been in the park, chased him.

They hit his head with a brick, stabbed him in the hand with a screwdriver and kicked him, before taking his bike, a £200 blue and green BMX given to him at Christmas.

The 14-year-old tried to stagger home, but collapsed unconscious at the bottom of Frank Lane, where he was found by a passer-by.

The boy had his two front teeth knocked loose, his hand was broken, he needed five stitches to a head wound, and was stabbed in the other hand.

His 40-year-old mother, who did not want to be named, said: "Nothing prepared me for what I saw. He was on the bench in the bus stop. The guy was supporting him, holding him up and he had a towel on his head.

"He was covered in blood and you could see skull in the cut on his forehead. I thought I was going to lose him. I was a wreck."

The boy was taken to Dewsbury and District Hospital and stayed overnight before being taken to Pinderfields for further treatment.

His mum added: "He doesn't want to go out, he won't leave the house. It's upset the whole family."

Insp Jenny Thompson said: "This was a vicious, unprovoked attack that has left him with serious injuries."

Last night, police arrested three Asian youths in the Savile Town area in connection with the attack.

The 14-year-old boy and two 16-year-old boys are currently in custody.

Dewsbury reporter

AND IN THE SAME NEWSPAPER...

A LABOURER was kicked in the head and needed stitches after an unprovoked attack.

Robert Dyson was attacked by a gang of men at 11pm on Friday. He was walking to his home in Ouzelwell Crescent, Thornhill Lees, after a quiet night out in Dewsbury.

The attack left him with a split lip, which needed internal and external stitches, and a gashed ear.

Robert, 46, said: "I looked over towards the play area and I saw five Asian lads and two white girls. One of the lads said, 'what are you looking at?' I said, 'nothing', and carried on walking.

"Then they ran over and stood round me in a circle."

One man punched Robert in the face. They pulled his shirt and knocked him off balance so he fell to the floor.

He said: "Two of them started kicking me. One of the lasses shouted, 'leave him alone, he hasn't done anything'."

The group then walked away and Robert continued home where he realised he needed hospital treatment.

He said: "I've been walking home for years and nothing like this has ever happened. I don't know what would have happened if the girls hadn't been there.

"Now I am just hoping one of them comes forward."

Police have issued descriptions of two of the youths. One is described as Asian, aged 18 to 21 and was wearing a white T-shirt, a second man of a similar age was wearing a baseball cap.

Witnesses should call on 0845 6060606 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

"Asian" Clerk Snubs British Mum for Supporting Injured Troops

MUM-of-three Beth Hoyle claims an Asda till worker refused to serve her because she was wearing a wristband backing injured troops.

Beth says the checkout lad told her the band for Help for Heroes - aided by The Sun - meant she supported the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And when she complained to a supervisor, he BACKED the Asian youth, saying he was entitled to his view.

Beth, 40, who has two brothers in the services, said the checkout worker told her he didn't want to serve her because of "what she was wearing."

Shocked Beth, of Whitworth, Greater Manchester, said that at first she thought the youth at Asda's Rochdale store meant a cross round her neck.

"He pointed to my Help for Heroes wristband and accused me of supporting the war. I told him it was nothing to do with the war, but about supporting our injured troops.

"I immediately complained to a supervisor, but he said it was his right not to serve me. I was disgusted."

An Asda spokeswoman said they were "shocked" by the claims but had found no evidence that the incident happened in their store.

She added: "We are big supporters of the Help for Heroes campaign and we sell the pin badges and wristband in hundreds of our stores."

A. Taylor

Let Asda know how you feel and boycott their Rochdale store

Asian Riot, Bury Park, Luton, 30/08/09

A 200-strong mob of Asian youths threw fireworks at riot police when violence broke out in a Luton park yesterday.

The Bedfordshire force sent 50 officers and six police horses to break up the disturbance in Bury Park, which began at 4.30pm and swiftly intensified. Police said that the confrontation was over by 7pm and two people had been arrested for public order offences.

The riot occurred a week after Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, granted an order banning unofficial marches through Luton. The order, effective for three months, was made after reports that the English and Welsh Defence League, a right-wing group, planned to hold a march this weekend to protest against Islamic fundamentalism.

In March Islamists demonstrated in Luton against troops returning from Afghanistan.

Chief Superintendent Andy Frost, of Bedfordshire Police, said that he was extremely disappointed that some members of the Asian community had used the occasion as “an opportunity to commit disorder and undo much of the excellent work that has been done by the police, council and community leaders to ensure the day passed without incident.

“There has been extensive public consultation and work behind the scenes to ensure Luton was not the chosen venue for any kind of march or protest but it would seem that for no apparent reason disorder has broken out in Bury Park,” he added.

“Although this incident was contained within Bury Park it has again put Luton under the spotlight for the wrong reasons.

“The town has enjoyed excellent community relations for a number of years but it seems a small minority has let Luton down.”

Muslims comprise about 15 per cent of Luton’s population.

Times Online

BIRMINGHAM RIOTS 2009

This young lad, who was nothing to do with the BDL protest against muslim extremism, was not part of the protest.

Here's a statement from someone who was in Birmingham on Saturday:

'as far as i’m aware the story behind this guy is that two people said to each other “lets rob him” and because they started hitting him the rest of the crowd, already wound p from the drunk guy gobbing off from earlier all pounced on him with at least 10 or 15 people kicking this guy on the ground. don’t think he was EDL but can’t confirm. However 20 yards behind this incident was a line of riot police guarding one street who not only failed to react to the violence but who stood idle and bloody useless as people were shouting for their help'

Here's another comment from Harry's Place:

'The majority of the people who were attacked were random passers by. The [EDL] had long gone by then. If you were a White male passing by the crowd you were going to get a kicking. There was even a foreign White guy who made the mistake of taking pictures of what was going on and he was attacked in front of his young baby who was left unprotected in its pram. Granted the majority of the attacks were not as brutal as the pictures on the Daily Mail Website but i still don’t think it should have happened. Ironically the UAF scarpered when they saw what was beginning to happen with the ethnic minority youths attacking innocent White passers by (not saying that a few of the people who were set upon weren’t inciting the minorities
because they were, but the vast majority just made the mistake of being in the wrong place at the wrong time) so it seems that the UAF only protest against racism when it is White racism directed towards ethnic minorities, not when it is the other way
around.'

And now from an article on the British Defence League blog:

'Some 2000 muslems and left wing police haters were on the streets, and spent the day attacking lone whites, and small groups, most of whom were nothing to do with our protest. Our main group were NOT attacked, as they were surrounded by police, but the police turned a lot of our supporters back on the trains, or sent them away, preventing a lot from reaching the protest, and standing by while some were attacked. This just serves to demonstrate how bad this country has got, when Islamic and left wing mobs are allowed to run around attacking people, while any attempt to
protest against the state of affairs this country is in by normal people is met with police harrassment and arrests.

Innocent people with their kids leaving football matches were also attacked by Muslems, which is a disgrace. Will these thugs faces be plastered all over the papers asking for info like they do with football hooligans? Dont hold your breath. All in all it was a success, and if everyone had been able to get there we would have had around
500. Next time will be bigger now, thanks to the photos of the disgusting attacks on British people trying to speak up against extremists and their supporters.

The next one will not be arranged via Faceache, we will arrange it via the Inner Circles secret forums, so we will arrive unnanounced and neither the police or the scum will know any details.'

Savage Asian Dog Fighting On Our Soil

As an animal lover, I am always horrified to hear of animal cruelty. As if there are not enough cases of it, we now have Asian crime gangs not only involved in guns and drugs but fighting dogs.

Old-fashioned dog fighting, although thoroughly distasteful and illegal, meant the dogs weighed the same, thus ensuring a fair fight. Asian dog fighting is a different story. The dogs are deliberately mismatched meaning a far bloodier battle.

Mike Butcher, chief inspector of special operations at the RSPCA, said: “The most serious injuries I’ve seen have been from fights run by this community. You get whole faces ripped off, bottom jaws missing, eyes out, legs broken. The dogs might just be left to fight to the death.

In Pakistan, dog fighting is still legal and the bully kutta is the favoured breed. Here in Great Britain pitbulls are imported from Croatia. Up to £20,000 is wagered on a single fight, and in the last two years, 60 British-born Asians were jailed for dog fighting.

In November 2008 Liaquat Ali, 40, from Accrington, Lancashire, was jailed for six months when he became the first person prosecuted under tougher laws banning organised dog fights.

In October 2007 seven Birmingham men were imprisoned for organising one of the bloodiest and longest dog fights ever. Two animals died after suffering 124 separate injuries while fighting for hours in a makeshift pit in a kitchen showroom in Alum Rock, Birmingham.

What I find hypocritical about this group of cowards is that they are Muslims. Their ‘religion’ tells them dogs are unclean. However, they don’t mind using them for protection when drug dealing or using them as fighting machines for sick entertainment.

With multicultural diversity comes savagery and this is a prime example.


http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/86693/Savage-brutes-brutal-savages/